-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 572
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MueLu: fixing RegionRFactory Laplace3D unit-test #7882
MueLu: fixing RegionRFactory Laplace3D unit-test #7882
Conversation
9546e6c
to
424e972
Compare
Fixing issue with inputs that were not specific for each rank. Also adding more specific tests in the unit-test to make sure that the size of the operator is correct.
Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - Auto Inspected - Inspection Is Not Necessary for this Pull Request. |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Testing Jenkins Projects: Pull Request Auto Testing STARTING (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_4.8.4
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_intel_17.0.1
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_4.9.3_SERIAL
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_7.2.0_debug
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_8.3.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_cuda_9.2
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_clang_10.0.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_python_2
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_python_3
Jenkins Parameters
Using Repos:
Pull Request Author: lucbv |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lucbv Thanks for the fix!
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Jenkins Testing: all Jobs PASSED Pull Request Auto Testing has PASSED (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_4.8.4
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_intel_17.0.1
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_4.9.3_SERIAL
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_7.2.0_debug
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_8.3.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_cuda_9.2
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_clang_10.0.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_python_2
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_python_3
Jenkins Parameters
|
Status Flag 'Pre-Merge Inspection' - SUCCESS: The last commit to this Pull Request has been INSPECTED AND APPROVED by [ mayrmt ]! |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Pull Request will be Automerged |
Merge on Pull Request# 7882: IS A SUCCESS - Pull Request successfully merged |
@mayrmt if you have a minute to double check that this fixes your problem, that would be nice : ) |
@lucbv I can confirm that |
Thanks @lucbv 😃 |
Excellent, one less bug, only two more to go as far as my code clean-up goes. |
@mayrmt I think I also should separate some of the helper functions for region unit-tests as you mentioned before. |
@lucbv Good idea! The proposed file name sounds reasonable. |
@trilinos/muelu
Motivation
Fixing issue with inputs that were not specific
for each rank. Also adding more specific tests
in the unit-test to make sure that the size of
the operator is correct.
Related Issues
Stakeholder Feedback
None
Testing
The previously failing unit-test is now passing and has been improved with more stringent tests.