Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add PSDBU part or the EPFAR feature #404

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2021
Merged

add PSDBU part or the EPFAR feature #404

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2021

Conversation

RoadRunnr
Copy link
Member

Support PFCP Session Deleted By the UP function procedure that is part
of the EPFAR (Enhanced PFCP Association Release) feature.
The actually release procedure is not supported, but the "Deleted By the UPF"
can already be used to signal session deletion in the UPF

Support `PFCP Session Deleted By the UP function` procedure that is part
of the EPFAR (Enhanced PFCP Association Release) feature.
The actually release procedure is not supported, but the "Deleted By the UPF"
can already be used to signal session deletion in the UPF
@RoadRunnr RoadRunnr requested a review from a team as a code owner June 3, 2021 11:21
#report_type{upir = 1} ->
up_inactivity_timeout;
_ ->
deleted_by_upf
Copy link
Contributor

@vkatsuba vkatsuba Jun 3, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In erGW-AAA we don't handle/mapping deleted_by_upf termination cause. Do we need also change erGW-AAA? If yes - what number of deleted_by_upf should be mapped?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. ergw_aaa should use a default mapping for unknown (new) causes. That it doesn't do that is IMHO a bug and should be fixed
  2. NAS Error would IMHO be a reasonable code

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What number should be for DIAMETER https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3588#section-8.15?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LetMeGoogleThatForYou....

The one assigned by IANA, of course.
The values can also be found in the dictionary: https://github.com/travelping/ergw_aaa/blob/master/dia/diameter_rfc4005_nasreq.dia#L718-L741

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@RoadRunnr RoadRunnr merged commit 74d1e9f into master Jun 4, 2021
@RoadRunnr RoadRunnr deleted the feature/epfar branch June 4, 2021 08:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants