-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add PSDBU part or the EPFAR feature #404
Conversation
Support `PFCP Session Deleted By the UP function` procedure that is part of the EPFAR (Enhanced PFCP Association Release) feature. The actually release procedure is not supported, but the "Deleted By the UPF" can already be used to signal session deletion in the UPF
#report_type{upir = 1} -> | ||
up_inactivity_timeout; | ||
_ -> | ||
deleted_by_upf |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In erGW-AAA
we don't handle/mapping deleted_by_upf
termination cause. Do we need also change erGW-AAA
? If yes - what number of deleted_by_upf
should be mapped?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- ergw_aaa should use a default mapping for unknown (new) causes. That it doesn't do that is IMHO a bug and should be fixed
- NAS Error would IMHO be a reasonable code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What number should be for DIAMETER https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3588#section-8.15?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LetMeGoogleThatForYou....
The one assigned by IANA, of course.
The values can also be found in the dictionary: https://github.com/travelping/ergw_aaa/blob/master/dia/diameter_rfc4005_nasreq.dia#L718-L741
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Support
PFCP Session Deleted By the UP function
procedure that is partof the EPFAR (Enhanced PFCP Association Release) feature.
The actually release procedure is not supported, but the "Deleted By the UPF"
can already be used to signal session deletion in the UPF