Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return SGW TEID in GTP session/context creation response header #322

Closed
vkatsuba opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #326
Closed

Return SGW TEID in GTP session/context creation response header #322

vkatsuba opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #326
Labels
feature 🚀 Feature Request

Comments

@vkatsuba
Copy link
Contributor

vkatsuba commented Feb 11, 2021

erGW version

2.8.6

Description

  • Motivation
    In the network during draining, when setting the erGW not to accept new requests (reject with "no resources available"), the many SGWs/SGSNs from different networks could not correlate the session creation requests and the responses. The analysis was that the root cause of the issue is that erGW returns the GTP rejections with the TEID GTP header value set to 0. While the specs (e.g. 3GPP 129.274) leave some space for interpretation.
  • Proposal
    Implement in the returning of the SGW TEID in the session error handling code.

Current behavior

The SGW TEID is not returning in the session error handling code.

Expected behavior

The SGW TEID is returning in the session error handling code.

@vkatsuba vkatsuba added the feature 🚀 Feature Request label Feb 11, 2021
RoadRunnr added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2021
Make sure to return a proper TEID when rejecting new sessions due to an internal block
(accept_new == false).

Fixes #322
RoadRunnr added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2021
Make sure to return a proper TEID when rejecting new sessions due to an internal block
(accept_new == false).

Fixes #322
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature 🚀 Feature Request
Projects
None yet
1 participant