Added support for 0079:1846 Mayflash/Dragonrise USB Gamecube Controller Adapter #716

redyoshi49q · 2019-09-04T21:41:10Z

Mayflash/Dragonrise seems to have yet another device ID for one of their Gamecube controller
adapters. Previous to this commit, the adapter registered only one /dev/input/js* device, and
all controller inputs (from any controller) were mapped to this device. This patch defines the
1846 USB device ID and enables the HID_QUIRK_MULTI_INPUT quirk for it, which ~~should~~ (I can now confirm: does) fix that.

…er Adapter Mayflash/Dragonrise seems to have yet another device ID for one of their Gamecube controller adapters. Previous to this commit, the adapter registered only one /dev/input/js* device, and all controller inputs (from any controller) were mapped to this device. This patch defines the 1846 USB device ID and enables the HID_QUIRK_MULTI_INPUT quirk for it, which should fix that.

KernelPRBot · 2019-09-04T21:45:13Z

Hi @redyoshi49q!

Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel!

Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch.

Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process.

Here's what to do:

Format your contribution according to kernel requirements
Decide who to send your contribution to
Set up your system to send your contribution as an email
Send your contribution and wait for feedback

How do I format my contribution?

The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations.

Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea.

You can create patches with git format-patch.

Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary.

Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with.

Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel.

Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this.

Where do I send my contribution?

The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes.

If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the get_maintainer.pl script in the kernel source can help you.

get_maintainer.pl will take the patch or patches you created in the previous step, and tell you who is responsible for them, and what mailing lists are used. You can also take a look at the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches.

It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.)

How do I send my contribution?

Use git send-email, which will ensure that your patches are formatted in the standard manner. In order to use git send-email, you'll need to configure git to use your SMTP email server.

For more information about using git send-email, look at the Git documentation or type git help send-email. There are a number of useful guides and tutorials about git send-email that can be found on the internet.

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed.

Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine.

If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:

Kernel Newbies - this website contains a lot of useful resources for new kernel developers.
The kernel documentation - see also the Documentation directory in the kernel tree.

If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers!

I sent my patch - now what?

You wait.

You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at.

Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:

You might get a response to your email. Often these will be comments, which may require you to make changes to your patch, or explain why your way is the best way. You should respond to these comments, and you may need to submit another revision of your patch to address the issues raised.
Your patch might be merged into the subsystem tree. Code that becomes part of Linux isn't merged into the main repository straight away - it first goes into the subsystem tree, which is managed by the subsystem maintainer. It is then batched up with a number of other changes sent to Linus for inclusion. (This process is described in some detail in the kernel development process guide).
Your patch might be ignored completely. This happens sometimes - don't take it personally. Here's what to do:
- Wait a bit more - patches often take several weeks to get a response; more if they were sent at a busy time.
- Kernel developers often silently ignore patches that break the rules. Check for obvious violations of the Submitting Patches guidelines, the style guidelines, and any other documentation you can find about your subsystem. Check that you're sending your patch to the right place.
- Try again later. When you resend it, don't add angry commentary, as that will get your patch ignored. It might also get you silently blacklisted.

Further information

Working with the kernel development community - the official documentation for new kernel contributors

Happy hacking!

This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot.

commit 68a031d upstream. When the source and destination addresses for the cipher are the same, we will get a NULL dereference from accessing the split destination scatterlist memories, as shown: [ 56.565719] tcrypt: [ 56.565719] testing speed of async ecb(aes) (hisi_sec_aes_ecb) encryption [ 56.574683] tcrypt: test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): [ 56.587585] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 [ 56.596361] Mem abort info: [ 56.599151] ESR = 0x96000006 [ 56.602196] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 56.608105] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 56.611149] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 56.614280] Data abort info: [ 56.617151] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006 [ 56.620976] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 56.623930] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = (____ptrval____) [ 56.630533] [0000000000000000] pgd=0000041fc7e4d003, pud=0000041fcd9bf003, pmd=0000000000000000 [ 56.639224] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 56.644782] Modules linked in: tcrypt(+) [ 56.648695] CPU: 21 PID: 2326 Comm: insmod Tainted: G W 4.19.0-rc6-00001-g3fabfb8-dirty torvalds#716 [ 56.658420] Hardware name: Huawei Taishan 2280 /D05, BIOS Hisilicon D05 IT17 Nemo 2.0 RC0 10/05/2018 [ 56.667537] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 56.672322] pc : sec_alg_skcipher_crypto+0x318/0x748 [ 56.677274] lr : sec_alg_skcipher_crypto+0x178/0x748 [ 56.682224] sp : ffff0000118e3840 [ 56.685525] x29: ffff0000118e3840 x28: ffff841fbb3f8118 [ 56.690825] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 [ 56.696125] x25: ffff841fbb3f8080 x24: ffff841fbadc0018 [ 56.701425] x23: ffff000009119000 x22: ffff841fbb24e280 [ 56.706724] x21: ffff841ff212e780 x20: ffff841ff212e700 [ 56.712023] x19: 0000000000000001 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 56.717322] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 56.722621] x15: ffff0000091196c8 x14: 72635f7265687069 [ 56.727920] x13: 636b735f676c615f x12: ffff000009119940 [ 56.733219] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 00000000006080c0 [ 56.738519] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff841fbb24e480 [ 56.743818] x7 : ffff841fbb24e500 x6 : ffff841ff00cdcc0 [ 56.749117] x5 : 0000000000000010 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 56.754416] x3 : ffff841fbb24e380 x2 : ffff841fbb24e480 [ 56.759715] x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff000008f682c8 [ 56.765016] Process insmod (pid: 2326, stack limit = 0x(____ptrval____)) [ 56.771702] Call trace: [ 56.774136] sec_alg_skcipher_crypto+0x318/0x748 [ 56.778740] sec_alg_skcipher_encrypt+0x10/0x18 [ 56.783259] test_skcipher_speed+0x2a0/0x700 [tcrypt] [ 56.788298] do_test+0x18f8/0x48c8 [tcrypt] [ 56.792469] tcrypt_mod_init+0x60/0x1000 [tcrypt] [ 56.797161] do_one_initcall+0x5c/0x178 [ 56.800985] do_init_module+0x58/0x1b4 [ 56.804721] load_module+0x1da4/0x2150 [ 56.808456] __se_sys_init_module+0x14c/0x1e8 [ 56.812799] __arm64_sys_init_module+0x18/0x20 [ 56.817231] el0_svc_common+0x60/0xe8 [ 56.820880] el0_svc_handler+0x2c/0x80 [ 56.824615] el0_svc+0x8/0xc [ 56.827483] Code: a94c87a3 910b2000 f87b7842 f9004ba2 (b87b7821) [ 56.833564] ---[ end trace 0f63290590e93d94 ]--- Segmentation fault Fix this by only accessing these memories when we have different src and dst. Fixes: 915e4e8 ("crypto: hisilicon - SEC security accelerator driver") Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Use helper bpf_redirect_map() and bpf_redirect_map_multi() to test bpf arg ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR and ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL. Make sure the map arg could be verified correctly when it is NULL or valid map pointer. Add devmap and devmap_hash in struct bpf_test due to bpf_redirect_{map, map_multi} limit. Test result: ]# ./test_verifier 713 716 torvalds#713/p ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR: null pointer OK torvalds#714/p ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR: valid map pointer OK torvalds#715/p ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL: null pointer for ex_map OK torvalds#716/p ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL: valid map pointer for ex_map OK Summary: 4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>

Use helper bpf_redirect_map() and bpf_redirect_map_multi() to test bpf arg ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR and ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL. Make sure the map arg could be verified correctly when it is NULL or valid map pointer. Add devmap and devmap_hash in struct bpf_test due to bpf_redirect_{map, map_multi} limit. Test result: ]# ./test_verifier 713 716 torvalds#713/p ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR: null pointer OK torvalds#714/p ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR: valid map pointer OK torvalds#715/p ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL: null pointer for ex_map OK torvalds#716/p ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL: valid map pointer for ex_map OK Summary: 4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>

rust: add per-arch `HAVE_RUST` kernel option

In ext4_ext_try_to_merge_up(), set path[1].p_bh to NULL after it has been released, otherwise it may be released twice. An example of what triggers this is as follows: split2 map split1 |--------|-------|--------| ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents ext4_split_convert_extents // path->p_depth == 0 ext4_split_extent // 1. do split1 ext4_split_extent_at ext4_ext_insert_extent ext4_ext_create_new_leaf ext4_ext_grow_indepth le16_add_cpu(&neh->eh_depth, 1) ext4_find_extent path->p_depth = 1 ext4_ext_try_to_merge ext4_ext_try_to_merge_up path->p_depth = 0 brelse(path[1].p_bh) ---> not set to NULL here // 2. update path ext4_find_extent // 3. do split2 ext4_split_extent_at ext4_ext_insert_extent ext4_ext_create_new_leaf ext4_ext_grow_indepth le16_add_cpu(&neh->eh_depth, 1) ext4_find_extent path[0].p_bh = NULL; path->p_depth = 1 read_extent_tree_block ---> return err // path[1].p_bh is still the old value ext4_free_ext_path ext4_ext_drop_refs // path->p_depth == 1 brelse(path[1].p_bh) ---> brelse a buffer twice Finally got the following WARRNING when removing the buffer from lru: ============================================ VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 72 at fs/buffer.c:1241 __brelse+0x58/0x90 CPU: 2 PID: 72 Comm: kworker/u19:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-dirty torvalds#716 RIP: 0010:__brelse+0x58/0x90 Call Trace: <TASK> __find_get_block+0x6e7/0x810 bdev_getblk+0x2b/0x480 __ext4_get_inode_loc+0x48a/0x1240 ext4_get_inode_loc+0xb2/0x150 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0xb7/0x230 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x144/0x6a0 ext4_ext_insert_extent+0x9c8/0x3230 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xf45/0x2dc0 ext4_map_blocks+0x724/0x1700 ext4_do_writepages+0x12d6/0x2a70 [...] ============================================ Fixes: ecb94f5 ("ext4: collapse a single extent tree block into the inode if possible") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

In ext4_ext_try_to_merge_up(), set path[1].p_bh to NULL after it has been released, otherwise it may be released twice. An example of what triggers this is as follows: split2 map split1 |--------|-------|--------| ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents ext4_split_convert_extents // path->p_depth == 0 ext4_split_extent // 1. do split1 ext4_split_extent_at |ext4_ext_insert_extent | ext4_ext_create_new_leaf | ext4_ext_grow_indepth | le16_add_cpu(&neh->eh_depth, 1) | ext4_find_extent | // return -ENOMEM |// get error and try zeroout |path = ext4_find_extent | path->p_depth = 1 |ext4_ext_try_to_merge | ext4_ext_try_to_merge_up | path->p_depth = 0 | brelse(path[1].p_bh) ---> not set to NULL here |// zeroout success // 2. update path ext4_find_extent // 3. do split2 ext4_split_extent_at ext4_ext_insert_extent ext4_ext_create_new_leaf ext4_ext_grow_indepth le16_add_cpu(&neh->eh_depth, 1) ext4_find_extent path[0].p_bh = NULL; path->p_depth = 1 read_extent_tree_block ---> return err // path[1].p_bh is still the old value ext4_free_ext_path ext4_ext_drop_refs // path->p_depth == 1 brelse(path[1].p_bh) ---> brelse a buffer twice Finally got the following WARRNING when removing the buffer from lru: ============================================ VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 72 at fs/buffer.c:1241 __brelse+0x58/0x90 CPU: 2 PID: 72 Comm: kworker/u19:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-dirty torvalds#716 RIP: 0010:__brelse+0x58/0x90 Call Trace: <TASK> __find_get_block+0x6e7/0x810 bdev_getblk+0x2b/0x480 __ext4_get_inode_loc+0x48a/0x1240 ext4_get_inode_loc+0xb2/0x150 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0xb7/0x230 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x144/0x6a0 ext4_ext_insert_extent+0x9c8/0x3230 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xf45/0x2dc0 ext4_map_blocks+0x724/0x1700 ext4_do_writepages+0x12d6/0x2a70 [...] ============================================ Fixes: ecb94f5 ("ext4: collapse a single extent tree block into the inode if possible") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>

In ext4_ext_try_to_merge_up(), set path[1].p_bh to NULL after it has been released, otherwise it may be released twice. An example of what triggers this is as follows: split2 map split1 |--------|-------|--------| ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents ext4_split_convert_extents // path->p_depth == 0 ext4_split_extent // 1. do split1 ext4_split_extent_at |ext4_ext_insert_extent | ext4_ext_create_new_leaf | ext4_ext_grow_indepth | le16_add_cpu(&neh->eh_depth, 1) | ext4_find_extent | // return -ENOMEM |// get error and try zeroout |path = ext4_find_extent | path->p_depth = 1 |ext4_ext_try_to_merge | ext4_ext_try_to_merge_up | path->p_depth = 0 | brelse(path[1].p_bh) ---> not set to NULL here |// zeroout success // 2. update path ext4_find_extent // 3. do split2 ext4_split_extent_at ext4_ext_insert_extent ext4_ext_create_new_leaf ext4_ext_grow_indepth le16_add_cpu(&neh->eh_depth, 1) ext4_find_extent path[0].p_bh = NULL; path->p_depth = 1 read_extent_tree_block ---> return err // path[1].p_bh is still the old value ext4_free_ext_path ext4_ext_drop_refs // path->p_depth == 1 brelse(path[1].p_bh) ---> brelse a buffer twice Finally got the following WARRNING when removing the buffer from lru: ============================================ VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 72 at fs/buffer.c:1241 __brelse+0x58/0x90 CPU: 2 PID: 72 Comm: kworker/u19:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-dirty torvalds#716 RIP: 0010:__brelse+0x58/0x90 Call Trace: <TASK> __find_get_block+0x6e7/0x810 bdev_getblk+0x2b/0x480 __ext4_get_inode_loc+0x48a/0x1240 ext4_get_inode_loc+0xb2/0x150 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0xb7/0x230 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x144/0x6a0 ext4_ext_insert_extent+0x9c8/0x3230 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xf45/0x2dc0 ext4_map_blocks+0x724/0x1700 ext4_do_writepages+0x12d6/0x2a70 [...] ============================================ Fixes: ecb94f5 ("ext4: collapse a single extent tree block into the inode if possible") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240822023545.1994557-9-libaokun@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

commit dcaa6c3 upstream. In ext4_ext_try_to_merge_up(), set path[1].p_bh to NULL after it has been released, otherwise it may be released twice. An example of what triggers this is as follows: split2 map split1 |--------|-------|--------| ext4_ext_map_blocks ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents ext4_split_convert_extents // path->p_depth == 0 ext4_split_extent // 1. do split1 ext4_split_extent_at |ext4_ext_insert_extent | ext4_ext_create_new_leaf | ext4_ext_grow_indepth | le16_add_cpu(&neh->eh_depth, 1) | ext4_find_extent | // return -ENOMEM |// get error and try zeroout |path = ext4_find_extent | path->p_depth = 1 |ext4_ext_try_to_merge | ext4_ext_try_to_merge_up | path->p_depth = 0 | brelse(path[1].p_bh) ---> not set to NULL here |// zeroout success // 2. update path ext4_find_extent // 3. do split2 ext4_split_extent_at ext4_ext_insert_extent ext4_ext_create_new_leaf ext4_ext_grow_indepth le16_add_cpu(&neh->eh_depth, 1) ext4_find_extent path[0].p_bh = NULL; path->p_depth = 1 read_extent_tree_block ---> return err // path[1].p_bh is still the old value ext4_free_ext_path ext4_ext_drop_refs // path->p_depth == 1 brelse(path[1].p_bh) ---> brelse a buffer twice Finally got the following WARRNING when removing the buffer from lru: ============================================ VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 72 at fs/buffer.c:1241 __brelse+0x58/0x90 CPU: 2 PID: 72 Comm: kworker/u19:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-dirty torvalds#716 RIP: 0010:__brelse+0x58/0x90 Call Trace: <TASK> __find_get_block+0x6e7/0x810 bdev_getblk+0x2b/0x480 __ext4_get_inode_loc+0x48a/0x1240 ext4_get_inode_loc+0xb2/0x150 ext4_reserve_inode_write+0xb7/0x230 __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x144/0x6a0 ext4_ext_insert_extent+0x9c8/0x3230 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xf45/0x2dc0 ext4_map_blocks+0x724/0x1700 ext4_do_writepages+0x12d6/0x2a70 [...] ============================================ Fixes: ecb94f5 ("ext4: collapse a single extent tree block into the inode if possible") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240822023545.1994557-9-libaokun@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

aUniqueUser approved these changes Oct 24, 2019

View reviewed changes

yestyle pushed a commit to yestyle/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2022

Merge pull request torvalds#716 from ojeda/select

35cf3a5

rust: add per-arch `HAVE_RUST` kernel option

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Added support for 0079:1846 Mayflash/Dragonrise USB Gamecube Controller Adapter #716

Added support for 0079:1846 Mayflash/Dragonrise USB Gamecube Controller Adapter #716

redyoshi49q commented Sep 4, 2019

KernelPRBot commented Sep 4, 2019

Added support for 0079:1846 Mayflash/Dragonrise USB Gamecube Controller Adapter #716

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Added support for 0079:1846 Mayflash/Dragonrise USB Gamecube Controller Adapter #716

Conversation

redyoshi49q commented Sep 4, 2019

KernelPRBot commented Sep 4, 2019

How do I format my contribution?

Where do I send my contribution?

How do I send my contribution?

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

I sent my patch - now what?

Further information