Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update documentation for multi-resource changes #686

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2019

Conversation

adamconnelly
Copy link
Contributor

  • I've updated the documentation and the guide on adding a new scraper to match the changes made to support multiple resources per metric.
  • I also tweaked the wording about adding docs in the new scraper guide so it doesn't sound optional. I figured if someone goes to the bother of adding a scraper they can easily add some docs based on the examples that are there.
  • Tweaked some of the wording where I spotted a few typos / mistakes while proof-reading.
  • I've also tweaked the example metric names used. Some of them didn't make sense now that multiple resources are supported, and I figured it made sense to just do a pass and make them all consistent.

Part of #513.

@tomkerkhove - as part of this I've updated all the resource docs to include two resources in each example to make it clear it supports more than one. I'm not totally sure if that's super clear, or if it's maybe confusing, but let me know your thoughts on it.

- I've updated the documentation and the guide on adding a new scraper to match the changes made to support multiple resources per metric.
- I also tweaked the wording about adding docs in the new scraper guide so it doesn't sound optional. I figured if someone goes to the bother of adding a scraper they can easily add some docs based on the examples that are there.
- Tweaked some of the wording where I spotted a few typos / mistakes while proof-reading.
- I've also tweaked the example metric names used. Some of them didn't make sense now that multiple resources are supported, and I figured it made sense to just do a pass and make them all consistent.

Part of tomkerkhove#513.
Copy link
Owner

@tomkerkhove tomkerkhove left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks man!

@tomkerkhove tomkerkhove merged commit feb8ebc into tomkerkhove:master Aug 27, 2019
@adamconnelly adamconnelly deleted the multi-resource-docs branch February 3, 2020 17:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants