Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: [Snyk] Security upgrade github-pages from 213 to 213 #1589

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2021

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `rubygems` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • docs/Gemfile
⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the Gemfile.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
low severity 461/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 3.3
Improper Input Validation
SNYK-RUBY-REXML-1244518
No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-REXML-1244518
@tomkerkhove tomkerkhove changed the title [Snyk] Security upgrade github-pages from 213 to 213 chore: [Snyk] Security upgrade github-pages from 213 to 213 Apr 10, 2021
@tomkerkhove tomkerkhove merged commit 9facd44 into master Apr 10, 2021
@tomkerkhove tomkerkhove deleted the snyk-fix-ca83a386dbd6da015f7358b209324960 branch April 10, 2021 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants