Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Miscelaneous adjustments #37

Merged
merged 48 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024
Merged

Miscelaneous adjustments #37

merged 48 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

tomchor
Copy link
Owner

@tomchor tomchor commented Jun 19, 2024

No description provided.

@tomchor
Copy link
Owner Author

tomchor commented Jun 28, 2024

Based on a comment, I'm now plotting the Rossby number snapshot as $Ro/Ro_h$, which makes it much easier to see the dynamics:

image

@tomchor
Copy link
Owner Author

tomchor commented Jun 30, 2024

@wenegrat I was wondering if I could get your opinion on some plots of (what I think are) CSIs.

This plot is the same that's currently on the paper, except that I'm plotting more downstream locations and also plotting vorticity into the page:

image

This is another plot that's in the paper, but with similar changes made.

image

It seems to me that just plotting the vorticity, things look a lot more like CSIs, but I'm not sure because one thing that I got from our last talk is that maybe I'm already biased with these plots and may be seeing things that aren't there. So it'd be nice to hear your take

@tomchor
Copy link
Owner Author

tomchor commented Jun 30, 2024

Also, we need to keep in mind that some of these bands that appear on the vorticity also happen for cyclonic simulations, so really we should be looking at the vorticity bands where there's negative PV. For example, here's an anticyclonic simulation:

image

and here's the same simulation, but cyclonic

image

So I think we need to be focusing on the vorticity in the thin BBL wake that has negative PV.

@wenegrat
Copy link
Collaborator

wenegrat commented Jul 1, 2024

Yeah, that's tricky. The banded shear structures do look CSI-like, but possibly they could be other things such as internal waves, or something about the tilted-eddy structure. That they persist in the cyclonic headland is also important, although there as well there is a low-PV layer (formed from the interaction with topography in the recirculation of the lee of the headland?).

@tomchor
Copy link
Owner Author

tomchor commented Jul 1, 2024

Yeah, that's tricky. The banded shear structures do look CSI-like, but possibly they could be other things such as internal waves, or something about the tilted-eddy structure. That they persist in the cyclonic headland is also important, although there as well there is a low-PV layer (formed from the interaction with topography in the recirculation of the lee of the headland?).

By low-PV do you mean negative PV? Or negative-and-zero PV?

But I think I understand what you're saying, and yes, there's also some negative PV in the cyclonic wakes due to the recirculation, although it's obviously a much smaller region. It does seem to act to mix PV and create regions of zero PV, which maybe muddies the waters a bit; no pun intended :)

@tomchor tomchor merged commit f82a12f into main Jul 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants