Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parse pluscal labels inserted due to macro #353

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

hwayne
Copy link
Contributor

@hwayne hwayne commented Dec 12, 2024

Fixes #352

image

Since parsing rules for label insertions due to macros are slightly different than parsing any other location in the translation output, I figured it would work best to add a separate parseLabelLocation method with different rules. See docstring for an explanation as to differences.

Signed-off-by: Hillel <h@hillelwayne.com>
@@ -124,21 +125,25 @@ export class TranspilerStdoutParser extends ProcessOutputHandler<DCollection> {
return false;
}

const matcher = /^\s\s([A-Za-z0-9_]+) at line \d+, column \d+$/g.exec(line);
const matcher = /^\s\s([A-Za-z0-9_]+) at line \d+, column \d+/g.exec(line);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note the removal of the $ at the end, so it will match as long as the string has matcher as a prefix. This is only called if we're in label parsing mode so won't affect parsing any other output.

*/

private parseLabelLocation(line: string): LocationInfo | undefined {
const rxLocation = /\s*(?:at )?line (\d+), column (\d+)(?: of macro called at line (\d+), column (\d+))?.?\s*/g; // no closing `$`
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think removing the $ is actually necessary here; if everything else in the PR looks okay I can test and possibly remove this comment.

@hwayne
Copy link
Contributor Author

hwayne commented Dec 12, 2024

Also, I checked procedure label insertion just to be sure. They work fine.

Copy link
Collaborator

@FedericoPonzi FedericoPonzi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Signed-off-by: Hillel <h@hillelwayne.com>
@hwayne
Copy link
Contributor Author

hwayne commented Dec 20, 2024

Comment moved, ready to merge!

@FedericoPonzi FedericoPonzi merged commit c077132 into tlaplus:master Dec 20, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"Show inserted labels" diagnostics don't work when a label is inserted via macro
2 participants