Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GCN apply for my own dataset but training_acc is low #56

Open
zq1335030905 opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

GCN apply for my own dataset but training_acc is low #56

zq1335030905 opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@zq1335030905
Copy link

my data is supervised, I don‘t know whether it will influence the result, and my training_acc is 0.0911,but val_acc is alwasy 0. and trainning_loss is decresing but val_loss is incresing. I don't know how to fix it , if anyone can help me , thank you a lot.

@xiyouxbr
Copy link

What is the format of your data set?

@zq1335030905
Copy link
Author

my_Data.content:
number_id first_x first_y second_x second_y ... fourteen_x fourteen_y label
(first_x,first_y) is the coordinates of first point. X and y are all float number not 0/1.
my_Data.cites:
first_number_id second_number_id

And my data set is not for semi-supervised but for supervised. I don't know whether it will influence my result. Is gcn like clustering for semi-supervised ? Thanks for your answering.

@xiyouxbr
Copy link

xiyouxbr commented Mar 29, 2020 via email

@zq1335030905
Copy link
Author

But my feature of a node cannot be represented by 0/1 , how can I solve this problem. If I use 0/1 to represent a node, that will be a parse matrix about 320*96 but there are 28 that value 1 and other is 0 . It may increase my calculation . ... If you have some advice, thanks very much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants