checker: use ttl cache #8505
checker: use ttl cache #8505
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <rleungx@gmail.com>
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue
release-note-none
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8505 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 77.34% 77.43% +0.08%
==========================================
Files 472 472
Lines 61796 61795 -1
==========================================
+ Hits 47799 47850 +51
+ Misses 10433 10371 -62
- Partials 3564 3574 +10
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed
and removed
do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue
labels
| @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ type Controller struct { | |||
|
|
|||
| // NewController create a new Controller. | |||
| func NewController(ctx context.Context, cluster sche.CheckerCluster, conf config.CheckerConfigProvider, ruleManager *placement.RuleManager, labeler *labeler.RegionLabeler, opController *operator.Controller) *Controller { | |||
| pendingProcessedRegions := cache.NewDefaultCache(DefaultPendingRegionCacheSize) | |||
| pendingProcessedRegions := cache.NewIDTTL(ctx, time.Minute, 3*time.Minute) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sure, previous suspectRegions is *cache.TTLUint64
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need to add a test for this issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's not just the problem of suspectRegions. The waiting list also has the same problem previously.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok, then do we need to add a test for this issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The original setting is 3 min.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // AddPendingProcessedRegions adds the pending processed region into the cache. | ||
| func (c *Controller) AddPendingProcessedRegions(ids ...uint64) { | ||
| for _, id := range ids { | ||
| if c.pendingProcessedRegions.Len() > DefaultPendingRegionCacheSize { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To prevent the cache from becoming too large.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If so, some regions, such as those from checkSuspectRanges or AccelerateRegionsScheduleInRange, may not be put successfully.
Should we only skip adding to pendingProcessedRegions in tryAddOperators when pendingProcessedRegions is full?
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <rleungx@gmail.com>
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
needs-1-more-lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: HuSharp, lhy1024 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@rleungx: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Close #8500
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note