storelimit: impl fead back by snapshot report (#6161)

[ti-chi-bot]

This is an automated cherry-pick of #6161

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Close #6147

What is changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

Master

In this PR

Code changes

Side effects

• Increased code complexity

Related changes

Release note

`store-limit-version` default value 'v1'. if it  be set as "v2", user don't need to add additional config to speed up the scale-out/scale-in, because the limit has been auto adjusted through the snapshot executing details.

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• CabinfeverB
• bufferflies

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 47.54% and project coverage change: -0.23 ⚠️

Comparison is base (5f99e0c) 75.29% compared to head (606957d) 75.06%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release-7.1    #6349      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        75.29%   75.06%   -0.23%     
===============================================
  Files              408      408              
  Lines            40414    40465      +51     
===============================================
- Hits             30428    30377      -51     
- Misses            7356     7441      +85     
- Partials          2630     2647      +17     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.06% <47.54%> (-0.23%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/core/constant/kind.go	47.27% <0.00%> (-11.82%)	⬇️
pkg/schedule/config/config.go	33.33% <ø> (ø)
pkg/schedule/operator/influence.go	89.74% <ø> (ø)
pkg/statistics/store_collection.go	88.95% <16.66%> (-2.62%)	⬇️
pkg/core/store.go	77.62% <28.57%> (-1.31%)	⬇️
pkg/core/storelimit/store_limit.go	87.50% <50.00%> (-1.98%)	⬇️
server/cluster/cluster.go	81.83% <62.50%> (-0.20%)	⬇️
pkg/core/storelimit/sliding_window.go	80.00% <75.00%> (-3.61%)	⬇️
server/config/config.go	75.76% <100.00%> (+0.10%)	⬆️
server/config/persist_options.go	92.54% <100.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

... and 26 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[bufferflies]

/hold

[bufferflies]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@bufferflies: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 606957d