(6.1) Fix the issue that primary pessimistic lock may be left not cleared after GC (#866) #867
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…fter GC Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>
ekexium
approved these changes
Jul 4, 2023
cfzjywxk
approved these changes
Jul 4, 2023
MyonKeminta
deleted the
m/fix-batch-resolve-lock-miss-primary-pessimistic-lock-6.1
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-picks #866 to tidb-6.1 branch
Ref pingcap/tidb#45134
The problem is that BatchResolveLock calls resolvePessimsticLock without calling getTxnStatus, but resolvePessimsticLock assumes getTxnStatus (in which CheckTxnStatus RPC is called) is done so it doesn't do anything to primary pessimistic lock. This may result in residue pessimistic locks in some rare cases.
This PR moves resolvePessimsticLock calling to after getTxnStatus to avoid the problem.