Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ADR 8: change "Decision outcome" #1486

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2021

Conversation

MVrachev
Copy link
Collaborator

@MVrachev MVrachev commented Jul 7, 2021

Description of the changes being introduced by the pull request:

After a discussion with Jussi, we realized that there are a couple of
places where we don't want to allow unrecognized fields because the
they are sensitive dictionaries and the specification requires an items
of certain types inside them.
The places where we don't want to allow unrecognized fields are
"keys", "roles", "meta", "hashes" or "targets".

This is pr is updating ADR8 with the decision we already take in #1466.

Signed-off-by: Martin Vrachev mvrachev@vmware.com

After a discussion with Jussi, we realized that there are a couple of
places where we don't want to allow unrecognized fields because the
they are sensitive dictionaries and the specification requires an items
of certain types inside them.
The places where we don't want to allow unrecognized fields are
"keys", "roles", "meta", "hashes" or "targets".

Signed-off-by: Martin Vrachev <mvrachev@vmware.com>
@MVrachev
Copy link
Collaborator Author

MVrachev commented Sep 1, 2021

@jku can you review that pr given that we have discussed unrecognized fields support with you in a couple of prs and issues.

@MVrachev MVrachev requested a review from jku September 1, 2021 09:45
Copy link
Member

@jku jku left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

content looks fine to me. I don't know how these ADRs are supposed to work, do we just change it like this?

@jku jku merged commit 5714885 into theupdateframework:develop Sep 8, 2021
@jku
Copy link
Member

jku commented Sep 8, 2021

🤷 well I merged it

@joshuagl
Copy link
Member

joshuagl commented Sep 8, 2021

I think that was appropriate. The goal of ADRs is to provide design documentation and make implicit assumptions explicit, so updating ADRs to capture nuance like this seems sensible to me.

@MVrachev MVrachev deleted the change-adr8 branch November 5, 2021 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants