Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: rename testClasse file #316

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

gabrielegranello
Copy link
Collaborator

@gabrielegranello gabrielegranello commented Feb 7, 2025

What does this PR do?

It renames the testClasses.ts file into calculateFairhold.ts.

Why?

I think the name testClasses.ts is misleading because no test is involved. The file contains the function calculateFairhold, so maybe we should change its name?

I was thinking actually a follow up PR should be developing the unit testing for it, i.e. calculateFairhold.test.ts because it is currently missing. OThinking of a file named testClasses.test.ts will become even more confusing to me

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 7, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
fairhold-dashboard ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 7, 2025 9:18am

@gabrielegranello gabrielegranello marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 09:20
@gabrielegranello gabrielegranello requested a review from a team February 7, 2025 09:20
Copy link
Collaborator

@zz-hh-aa zz-hh-aa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks for getting round to this chore!

@gabrielegranello gabrielegranello merged commit ec7e3fb into main Feb 7, 2025
5 checks passed
@gabrielegranello gabrielegranello deleted the gg/rename-test-classes branch February 7, 2025 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants