Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shipa 2578 pr #238

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 23, 2022
Merged

Shipa 2578 pr #238

merged 10 commits into from
Mar 23, 2022

Conversation

DavisFrench
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Apps can now be deployed as a statefulset if the type in appSpec is specified as "StatefulSet", and volumeClaimTemplates are provided. The default type for apps is deployment.

Both deployment and statefulset use AppDeploymentEvent. I'm treating an app deployment (in terms of ketch) as type independent (when it comes to statefulset versus deployment in k8s). It is possible to create unique events based on which type of deployment if need be.

This PR addresses the comments left by @aleksej-paschenko in this PR, which I will close in favor of this one after this gets merged.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Chore (documentation addition or typo, file relocation)

Testing

  • New tests were added with this PR that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (describe below this bullet)
  • This change requires no testing (i.e. documentation update)

Documentation

  • All added public packages, funcs, and types have been documented with doc comments
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas

Final Checklist:

  • I followed standard GitHub flow guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • My changes generate no new warnings

Additional Information (omit if empty)

Please include anything else relevant to this PR that may be useful to know.

@DavisFrench DavisFrench mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2022
11 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@aleksej-paschenko aleksej-paschenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks great!
lets discuss which PR we want to merge
@stinkyfingers @koncar

@DavisFrench DavisFrench merged commit 23dd04b into main Mar 23, 2022
@DavisFrench DavisFrench deleted the SHIPA-2578-PR branch March 23, 2022 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants