Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Puppet start workaround on Debian #807

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2021

Conversation

ekohl
Copy link
Member

@ekohl ekohl commented Sep 27, 2021

Back with Puppet 3 there was a workaround to not start Puppet by default but since Debian Jessie (854487) this no longer exists. It now uses regular init integration. This also doesn't affect AIO which never implemented it this way.

Back with Puppet 3 there was a workaround to not start Puppet by default
but since Debian Jessie ([854487]) this no longer exists. It now uses
regular init integration. This also doesn't affect AIO which never
implemented it this way.

[854487]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854487
@@ -616,7 +614,6 @@
Array[String] $auth_allowed = $puppet::params::auth_allowed,
Variant[String, Array[String]] $client_package = $puppet::params::client_package,
Boolean $agent = $puppet::params::agent,
Boolean $remove_lock = $puppet::params::remove_lock,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this makes it a backwards-incompatible change, right?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct so I added the Backwards incompatible label to it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, I missed that somehow.

@ehelms ehelms merged commit 50e1397 into theforeman:master Oct 19, 2021
@ekohl ekohl deleted the remove-old-debian-workaround branch October 20, 2021 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants