Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Undertow Adapter #53

Closed
testinfected opened this issue Oct 29, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Undertow Adapter #53

testinfected opened this issue Oct 29, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
feature
Milestone
0.11 - The Undert...

Comments

@testinfected
Copy link
Owner

Provide a server adapter for Undertow. Undertow is a performant web server written in java based on NIO.
testinfected added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2016
@testinfected
Turn existing simple server tests into server compatibility tests
a9bc6c0 
We'd like a compatibility test suite for servers to introduce other server adapters, such as undertow.

 See #53
testinfected added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2016
@testinfected
Strengthen server compatibility test harness
562df50 
Server should support query params, form encoded params, multi part params.

See #53
testinfected added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2016
@testinfected
Add a server adapter for undertow.io
a4b7605 
Simple remains the default adapter for the web server for the time being, but we might make undertow the default in the future since my own benchmarks show that undertow gets 3 times the throughput.

See #53
testinfected added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2016
@testinfected
Add an option to power the web server with Undertow
77da6eb 
See #53
@testinfected testinfected modified the milestone: v0.11 - Undertow Nov 8, 2016
@testinfected
Copy link
Owner Author

testinfected commented Nov 9, 2016 •
edited
Loading

We need to load the Server class dynamically to avoid NoClassDefFoundErrors since client code won't include both Simple and Undertow in their classpath.

We can therefore remove the need for different factory methods for the web server and rely instead on a single WebServer#create method, which will select the available server.

@testinfected testinfected reopened this Nov 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.11 - The Undertow Edition
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@testinfected