Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(#694): Add Ryuk container privileged custom configuration #709

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 12, 2022

Conversation

HofmeisterAn
Copy link
Collaborator

What does this PR do?

Adds GetRyukContainerPrivileged(string) to the CustomConfiguration incl. to the equivalent implementations of environment (TESTCONTAINERS_RYUK_CONTAINER_PRIVILEGED) and properties file (ryuk.container.privileged) custom configuration.

Why is it important?

The custom configuration is required to start the Resource Reaper in privileged mode. Some environments require this configuration or mode. In addition it aligns with the configurations Java offers.

Related issues

Follow-ups

Use the custom configuration to create and start the Resource Reaper container.

@HofmeisterAn HofmeisterAn added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 11, 2022
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 11, 2022

Deploy Preview for testcontainers-dotnet ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0d3dba8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/testcontainers-dotnet/deploys/6396d7d629a13b0008d3e339
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-709--testcontainers-dotnet.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@HofmeisterAn HofmeisterAn merged commit 8db93b2 into develop Dec 12, 2022
@HofmeisterAn HofmeisterAn deleted the feature/694-add-ryuk-container-privileged branch December 12, 2022 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant