Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lb nat pool #24

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 9, 2018
Merged

Lb nat pool #24

merged 9 commits into from
Aug 9, 2018

Conversation

thetonymaster
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @thetonymaster,

Thank you for the PR, I have left some comments inline that need to be addressed.

I have applied these changes to the azure provider here

return &schema.Resource{
Create: resourceArmLoadBalancerNatPoolCreate,
Read: resourceArmLoadBalancerNatPoolRead,
Update: resourceArmLoadBalancerNatPoolCreate,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we change this to resourceArmLoadBalancerNatPoolCreateUpdate ?

Type: schema.TypeString,
Required: true,
ForceNew: true,
},
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we get some validation here? at a minimum validation.NoZeroValues

Required: true,
StateFunc: ignoreCaseStateFunc,
DiffSuppressFunc: ignoreCaseDiffSuppressFunc,
},
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we add validation for all possible protocols here?

"frontend_port_end": {
Type: schema.TypeInt,
Required: true,
},
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we validate this and ensure the values is a valid port number?

"backend_port": {
Type: schema.TypeInt,
Required: true,
},
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we validate this and ensure the values is a valid port number?

ID: rule.ID,
}

properties.FrontendIPConfiguration = &feip
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could become

properties.FrontendIPConfiguration = &network.SubResource{
			ID: rule.ID,
		}

InboundNatPoolPropertiesFormat: &properties,
}

return &natPool, nil
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this could become

return &network.InboundNatPool{
		Name: utils.String(d.Get("name").(string)),
		InboundNatPoolPropertiesFormat: &properties,
	}, nil

return fmt.Sprintf(`

resource "azurestack_resource_group" "test" {
name = "acctestRG-%d"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very minor but could we align the =s here?

page_title: "Azure Resource Manager: azurestack_lb_nat_pool"
sidebar_current: "docs-azurestack-resource-loadbalancer-nat-pool"
description: |-
Create a LoadBalancer NAT Pool.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we change this to Manages?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also LoadBalancer -> Load Balancer to match the azure docs


# azurestack_lb_nat_pool

Create a LoadBalancer NAT pool.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we change this to Manages?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also LoadBalancer -> Load Balancer to match the azure docs (all instances of this should be fixed)

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates @thetonymaster, LGTM 👍

@katbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

katbyte commented Aug 9, 2018

tests pass:
screen shot 2018-08-09 at 16 36 39

@katbyte katbyte merged commit 1380a2e into hashicorp:master Aug 9, 2018
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2018
@katbyte katbyte added this to the 0.3.0 milestone Aug 13, 2018
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 27, 2019

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 27, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants