Skip to content

tdudgeon/simple-simulate-complex

Repository files navigation

OpenMM simulation example

This repo is an effort to work out how to run a simulation of a protein-ligand complex with OpenMM.

What I'm looking for is for this to be as simple as possible:

  1. read protein from PDB file
  2. read ligand ideally from molfile or SDF
  3. combine the protein and ligand into a complex
  4. parameterise the ligand using GAFF
  5. simulate
  6. analyse

You might also want to look at this detailed example from openforcefields: https://github.com/openforcefield/openff-toolkit/tree/stable/examples/toolkit_showcase. It is a more elegant approach as it would allow to prepare a system for multiple MM toolkits (Gromacs, Amber etc.) However, I can't get it to work for a number of reasons, so the examples here stick to using mostly OpenMM tooling.

Many thanks to @jchodera and others in the OpenMM community for help in putting these scripts together.

Versions and branches

OpenMM and its related tools change quite a bit over time. The original work here was based on OpenMM version 7.4, and the tools have now been updated for newer versions. Because the code is somewhat version dependent I have created branches for specific versions. The code on master branch will typically be for the latest version I have used (not always the latest version of OpenMM).

History

2020

  • initial version based on OpenMM 7.4
  • main tools are for simulating a ligand-protein complex with and without solvent

Sep 2023

  • updated for OpenMM 7.7
  • combined simulateComplex.py and simulateComplexWithSolvent.py into a single script
  • better handling of commandline options (using argparse)
  • many more options specifiable

simulateProtein.py: Basic Protein Simulation

python simulateProtein.py protein.pdb

Minimal example of setting up a protein and doing a simple minimisation.

Not much to say about this.

simulateComplex.py: Protein-ligand Complex Simulation

How to set up a protein-ligand complex simulation. This script replaces the original one and simulateComplexWithSolvent.py and provides a single script that assembles a protein and a ligand and optionally allows to solvate the system.

Options:

$ python simulateComplex.py -h
usage: simulateComplex.py [-h] -p PROTEIN -l LIGAND [-o OUTPUT] [-s STEPS] [-z STEP_SIZE] [-f FRICTION_COEFF] [-i INTERVAL] [-t TEMPERATURE] [--solvate] [--padding PADDING]
                          [--water-model {tip3p,spce,tip4pew,tip5p,swm4ndp}] [--positive-ion POSITIVE_ION] [--negative-ion NEGATIVE_ION] [--ionic-strength IONIC_STRENGTH] [--no-neutralize] [-e EQUILIBRATION_STEPS]
                          [--protein-force-field PROTEIN_FORCE_FIELD] [--ligand-force-field LIGAND_FORCE_FIELD] [--water-force-field WATER_FORCE_FIELD]

simulateComplexWithSolvent

options:
  -h, --help            show this help message and exit
  -p PROTEIN, --protein PROTEIN
                        Protein PDB file
  -l LIGAND, --ligand LIGAND
                        Ligand molfile
  -o OUTPUT, --output OUTPUT
                        Base name for output files
  -s STEPS, --steps STEPS
                        Number of steps
  -z STEP_SIZE, --step-size STEP_SIZE
                        Step size (ps
  -f FRICTION_COEFF, --friction-coeff FRICTION_COEFF
                        Friction coefficient (ps)
  -i INTERVAL, --interval INTERVAL
                        Reporting interval
  -t TEMPERATURE, --temperature TEMPERATURE
                        Temperature (K)
  --solvate             Add solvent box
  --padding PADDING     Padding for solvent box (A)
  --water-model {tip3p,spce,tip4pew,tip5p,swm4ndp}
                        Water model for solvation
  --positive-ion POSITIVE_ION
                        Positive ion for solvation
  --negative-ion NEGATIVE_ION
                        Negative ion for solvation
  --ionic-strength IONIC_STRENGTH
                        Ionic strength for solvation
  --no-neutralize       Don't add ions to neutralize
  -e EQUILIBRATION_STEPS, --equilibration-steps EQUILIBRATION_STEPS
                        Number of equilibration steps
  --protein-force-field PROTEIN_FORCE_FIELD
                        Protein force field
  --ligand-force-field LIGAND_FORCE_FIELD
                        Ligand force field
  --water-force-field WATER_FORCE_FIELD
                        Ligand force field

Many of the options are related to the solvation and are not needed unless you use the --solvate option. Most options have sensible defaults.

The protein is read in PDB format and added to a Modeller object. The ligand is then added to the Modeller to generate the complex. If --solvate is specified a solvent box is added. The system is then prepared using the appropriate force fields, the complex minimised, then equilibrated and finally the MD simulation is run.

Try the simulation without solvation as:

$ python simulateComplex.py -p protein.pdb -l ligand1.mol
simulateComplexWithSolvent:  Namespace(protein='protein.pdb', ligand='ligand1.mol', output='output', steps=5000, step_size=0.002, friction_coeff=1, interval=1000, temperature=300, solvate=False, padding=10, water_model='tip3p', positive_ion='Na+', negative_ion='Cl-', ionic_strength=0.0, no_neutralize=False, equilibration_steps=200, protein_force_field='amber/ff14SB.xml', ligand_force_field='gaff-2.11', water_force_field='amber/tip3p_standard.xml')
Processing protein.pdb and ligand1.mol with 5000 steps generating outputs output_complex.pdb output_minimised.pdb output_traj.dcd
Using platform CUDA
Set precision for platform CUDA to mixed
Reading ligand
Preparing system
Reading protein
Preparing complex
System has 4645 atoms
Adding ligand...
System has 4666 atoms
Simulating for 0.01 ns
No Periodic Box
Minimising ...
Equilibrating ...
Starting simulation with 5000 steps ...
#"Step","Potential Energy (kJ/mole)","Temperature (K)"
5000,-19906.630997571585,297.9683027771655
Simulation complete in 0.02 mins at 300 K. Total wall clock time was 0.106 mins
Simulation time was 0.01 ns

The files output_complex.pdb, output_minimised.pdb and output_traj.dcd are generated. The first is the complex, the second is that complex mimimised ready for simulation, the third the MD trajectory in DCD format.

See the code for details and gotchas.

To run with solvation use something like this:

$ python simulateComplex.py -p protein.pdb -l ligand1.mol --solvate
simulateComplexWithSolvent:  Namespace(protein='protein.pdb', ligand='ligand1.mol', output='output', steps=5000, step_size=0.002, friction_coeff=1, interval=1000, temperature=300, solvate=True, padding=10, water_model='tip3p', positive_ion='Na+', negative_ion='Cl-', ionic_strength=0.0, no_neutralize=False, equilibration_steps=200, protein_force_field='amber/ff14SB.xml', ligand_force_field='gaff-2.11', water_force_field='amber/tip3p_standard.xml')
Processing protein.pdb and ligand1.mol with 5000 steps generating outputs output_complex.pdb output_minimised.pdb output_traj.dcd
Using platform CUDA
Set precision for platform CUDA to mixed
Reading ligand
Preparing system
Reading protein
Preparing complex
System has 4645 atoms
Adding ligand...
System has 4666 atoms
Adding solvent...
System has 58052 atoms
Simulating for 0.01 ns
Default Periodic box: [Quantity(value=Vec3(x=8.481300000000001, y=0.0, z=0.0), unit=nanometer), Quantity(value=Vec3(x=0.0, y=8.481300000000001, z=0.0), unit=nanometer), Quantity(value=Vec3(x=0.0, y=0.0, z=8.481300000000001), unit=nanometer)]
Minimising ...
Equilibrating ...
Starting simulation with 5000 steps ...
#"Step","Potential Energy (kJ/mole)","Temperature (K)"
5000,-742769.3383788001,301.45460839045137
Simulation complete in 0.145 mins at 300 K. Total wall clock time was 0.508 mins
Simulation time was 0.01 ns

The system now has 58,052 atoms and takes quite a lot longer to simulate. On my laptop's GeForce GTX 1050 GPU it takes almost 2 mins. A 1ns simulation takes just under one hour. (these were using OpenMM 7.4). On a newer Geforce RTX 3060 GPU (a modern mid-range gamers card) it takes just over half a minute, and the 1ns simulation takes approx 15 mins, a 100ns simulation about 20 hours.

Output is similar to the previous example.

Note that when adding solvent you are creating a periodic box system, and this can introduce weird visual quirks. See this discussion for more details. Those quirks can be resolved by using the analyse.py script that is described below.

Protein and ligand preparation

Note: these scripts have not yet been updated for OpenMM 77

The previous methods were a bit of a cheat as they used a protein that had been fully prepared for simulation. It's pretty unlikely you will start with a protein in that state. There are 2 scripts that illustrate how preparation can be done. The aim is to be able to do this entirely within OpenMM, but it seems that's not quite possible.

The scripts are:

prepareProtein.py

 python prepareProtein.py protein.pdb protein

This strips out everything that is not the protein, fixes problems in the protein, adds hydrogens and writes the file protein_prepared.pdb. That file can be used as inputs to the previous simulations.

prepareComplex.py

 python prepareComplex.py data/Mpro-x0387_0_apo-desolv.pdb Mpro-x0387_0

This aims to build a PDB file with protein and ligand (and optionally the crystallographic waters) that is ready for simulation. It writes the files protein_prepared.pdb and ligand_prepared.pdb. It doesn't do everything that's needed, so other toolkits will be required:

  • ligand does not have hydrogens added
  • ligand can only be written to PDB format

Analysis

The MD trajectories are analysed using the script analyse.py which uses MDTraj.

Usage:

$ python analyse.py -h
usage: analyse.py [-h] -p PROTEIN -t TRAJECTORY -o OUTPUT [-r]

analyse

options:
  -h, --help            show this help message and exit
  -p PROTEIN, --protein PROTEIN
                        Protein PDB file
  -t TRAJECTORY, --trajectory TRAJECTORY
                        Trajectory DCD file
  -o OUTPUT, --output OUTPUT
                        Output base name
  -r, --remove-waters   Remove waters, salts etc.

This requires the trajectory to be written out using the DCD reporter. The topology can be read from the minimised starting point of the MD run. This can be used for simulations with or without water.

The RMSD of the ligand and the protein C-alpha atoms compared to the start of the trajectory are displayed in a chart that is generated using Plotly) with the name output.svg.

The trajectory is also re-imaged so that the ligand is in the correct location with respect to the protein (the periodic box can cause some wierd visual aberations), and the waters, ions etc. removed if required.

Example:

$ python analyse.py -p output_minimised.pdb -t output_traj.dcd -o output_reimaged -r
analyse:  Namespace(protein='output_minimised.pdb', trajectory='output_traj.dcd', output='output_reimaged', remove_waters=True)
Reading trajectory output_traj.dcd
Removing waters
Realigning
Writing re-imaged PDB output_reimaged.pdb
Writing re-imaged trajectory output_reimaged.dcd
Number of frames: 500
21 ligand atoms
1216 backbone atoms
Writing RMSD output to output_reimaged.svg

In this case 3 files are created:

  • output_reimaged.svg - SVG of the RMSD of the backbone and ligand
  • output_reimaged.pdb - the re-imaged PDB file
  • output_reimaged.dcd - the re-imaged trajectory

Example RMSD analysis: Example analysis

The trajectory can be nicely viewed in NGLView. First load the PDB file, then click on the menu for the item in the selector on the right, find the Trajectory section and load the DCD file.

For complexes that are stable the RMSDs should not change dramatically. For a complex that is unstable the ligand may detach from the protein and the RMSD will increase dramatically. Relatively long simulations will be needed, maybe in the order of 100s of ns (input welcome on this and on how valid these simulations will be without explicit water).

Improvements

Suggestions for how to improve these scripts and/or additional examples are welcome.

About

Simple protein-ligand complex simulation with OpenMM

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages