-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 780
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Created a centralized please command #1537
Conversation
I was able to test this in VSCode and jet brains on the mac but I was unable to test the other implementations to make sure they're working. I could use a hand with testing on other platforms to make sure these things still work, though the implementations appear correct to me right now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense to use a tag for this to avoid "promising what we can't deliver". With the exception of the tiny nit I mentioned, the only other thing I can think that might is whether we'd like to continue sending an empty string for "please" by itself or define two voice commands and an action with an optional argument. I don't feel strongly one way or the other.
To avoid divergence in the grammar for please commands, it is useful to define a centralized tag and allow it to be overridden in command implementations.
- It looks like the formatting was more than just adding a comma ; this should be cleaner now
3750d85
to
1a17a4c
Compare
- Only insert text if it was searched for
To avoid divergence in the grammar for please commands, it is useful to define a centralized tag and allow it to be overridden in command implementations.
Addresses #1536