Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cleanup goreleaser debug steps #2374

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024
Merged

cleanup goreleaser debug steps #2374

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

trajan0x
Copy link
Contributor

@trajan0x trajan0x commented Mar 27, 2024

Description

Removes superflous debug steps from goreleaser

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Streamlined the release workflow for improved efficiency.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 27, 2024

Walkthrough

This update refines the GoReleaser workflow within a project by removing debugging steps that were deemed unnecessary. The focus has shifted towards a more streamlined and efficient process, enhancing the overall release mechanism by concentrating solely on the pivotal elements of GoReleaser.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/.../goreleaser-actions.yml Removed debug steps and streamlined the workflow for GoReleaser.

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where the rabbits dwell,
A workflow was streamlined, oh how swell!
No more debug steps to impede our race,
Just GoReleaser's grace, setting the pace.
Hop, hop, hooray, in the digital space!
🚀🐰

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@github-actions github-actions bot added M-ci Module: CI size/xs labels Mar 27, 2024
Copy link

Deploying sanguine-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: b645ff8
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://70d5207a.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://fix-goreleaser-cleanup.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca1ec3a and b645ff8.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
.github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml (7)
  • 176-181: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [50-50]

The note about automatically pushing the latest tag for sanguine-goreleaser even on branched workflows raises a concern. This could indeed break local development environments that rely on working versions of this image. It's advisable to push the latest tag only on the main branch and consider using specific version tags.

Consider implementing a conditional check to ensure that the latest tag is only pushed when the workflow runs on the main branch. Additionally, adopting a versioning strategy for Docker images could improve reliability and traceability.

  • 176-181: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [63-63]

Using a custom Docker image (ghcr.io/synapsecns/sanguine/git-changes-action:latest) for change detection is a good practice for encapsulating the logic. However, ensure that this image is maintained and updated as necessary to avoid potential issues with change detection accuracy.

  • 176-181: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [107-107]

The use of goreleaser --timeout 900m --clean --debug with a very long timeout (900 minutes) and debug mode enabled might not be suitable for all scenarios. While debug mode can be helpful for troubleshooting, consider disabling it for routine releases to reduce log verbosity and potentially improve execution time.

Evaluate the necessity of the --debug flag for routine releases and consider adjusting the timeout to a more reasonable duration based on typical execution times.

  • 176-181: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [141-141]

The logic for determining whether Docker images need to be built and pushed (steps.image_check.outputs.has_images == 'true') is a good practice for optimizing the workflow. However, ensure that the yq command correctly evaluates the .goreleaser.yml configuration to accurately detect the presence of Docker configurations.

  • 176-181: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [158-158]

The logic for tagging and pushing Docker images uses the commit SHA as the tag. This is a good practice for traceability. However, ensure that the Docker tag and push commands are executed correctly and that the image_name environment variable is properly set.

Verification successful

Given the limitations of the previous script execution, we need to directly inspect the GitHub Actions workflow files to verify the Docker image tagging and pushing logic. Let's proceed with examining the relevant sections of the .github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml file to ensure that Docker images are correctly tagged and pushed, and that the image_name environment variable is properly set and used.


The Docker image tagging and pushing logic in the .github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml file correctly uses the commit SHA for image tags, ensuring traceability. The image_name environment variable is dynamically set and consistently used in Docker operations. This setup aligns with good CI/CD practices, confirming the original review comment's observations.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that Docker images are correctly tagged and pushed
# Note: This script is for conceptual verification and may need to be adjusted based on actual repository and Docker registry setup.
echo "Verify Docker image tagging and pushing logic in CI logs."

Length of output: 124



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Docker operations in the GitHub Actions workflow file
grep -A 5 -B 5 "docker push" .github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml
grep -A 5 -B 5 "docker tag" .github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml
grep "image_name" .github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml

Length of output: 1263

* 176-181: > 📝 **NOTE** > This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [172-172]

Zipping and pushing artifacts as snapshots is a useful step for preserving build outputs. However, ensure that the zip command includes all relevant files and directories from the dist directory and that the artifact name is correctly set based on the project name.

Verification successful

Given the limitations of the provided context and the inability to review CI logs directly, the next best step is to inspect the .github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml file for the relevant commands and configurations related to zipping artifacts and setting artifact names. This will help in verifying if the setup is likely to include all relevant files from the dist directory and correctly set the artifact name based on the project name.


The verification process has confirmed that the .github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml file includes a step to zip all relevant files and directories from the dist directory into an archive named after the project name. Additionally, the artifact name is correctly set based on the project name for both the creation and upload of the zip file. Therefore, the original review comment's concerns are adequately addressed by the workflow configuration.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that all relevant files and directories are included in the zip archive
echo "Review CI logs to ensure that the zip command includes all relevant files from the dist directory."

Length of output: 206



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Inspect the goreleaser-actions.yml for zip command and artifact naming
grep -A 5 -B 5 'zip' .github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml
grep -A 5 -B 5 'artifact' .github/workflows/goreleaser-actions.yml

Length of output: 1424

* 176-181: > 📝 **NOTE** > This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [184-184]

The conditional logic for copying releases based on the tag name and the use of a custom Docker image (ghcr.io/synapsecns/sanguine/release-copier-action:latest) for this purpose are well-implemented. However, ensure that the destination repositories and the strip_prefix values are correctly configured to match the intended structure of the target repositories.

Comment on lines 176 to 181
username: ${{ github.actor }}
password: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

- name: debug
run: go version

- name: debug2
run: goreleaser -v

- name: Run GoReleaser (Release)
if: steps.branch-name.outputs.is_default == 'true'
run: goreleaser --timeout 900m --clean --debug -f ${{matrix.package}}/.goreleaser.yml
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [26-26]

The TODO comment regarding the if block needing to be run on every step is present. It's important to track this limitation and address it when the GitHub Actions runner issue #662 is resolved.

Would you like me to open a GitHub issue to track this TODO for future resolution?

@trajan0x trajan0x merged commit d6efa6e into master Mar 27, 2024
27 checks passed
@trajan0x trajan0x deleted the fix/goreleaser-cleanup branch March 27, 2024 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
M-ci Module: CI size/xs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant