Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace extract() with proper check #297

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 24, 2017
Merged

Replace extract() with proper check #297

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 24, 2017

Conversation

nitriques
Copy link
Member

extract may lead to overwriting other variable, which can lead to
disaster when the function is called over used supplied data.

Fixes #252

extract may lead to overwriting other variable, which can lead to
disaster when the function is called over used supplied data.

Fixes #252
@nitriques nitriques self-assigned this Oct 20, 2017
@nitriques nitriques requested review from michael-e and brendo October 20, 2017 17:41
@nitriques
Copy link
Member Author

@michael-e Sorry, I realized that I've missed some extract() class. I've added 4554531. Can you review again please ?

Copy link
Member

@michael-e michael-e left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@brendo brendo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me too.

@nitriques nitriques merged commit e36619a into integration Oct 24, 2017
@nitriques nitriques deleted the extract branch October 24, 2017 15:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants