Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: output $$Props code differently #2153

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 11, 2023
Merged

fix: output $$Props code differently #2153

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

dummdidumm
Copy link
Member

Using a type union instead of spread, because the latter does remove index signatures from the resulting type #1825

@dummdidumm
fix: output $$Props code differently
3090741 
Using a type union instead of spread, because the latter does remove index signatures from the resulting type
#1825
@dummdidumm
adjust output to match "is generated" heuristic again
3b81f5a
@dummdidumm
fxi test
7b2e37e
@dummdidumm dummdidumm merged commit 93f6415 into master Sep 11, 2023
2 checks passed
@dummdidumm dummdidumm deleted the props-type-gen branch September 11, 2023 12:08
@huntabyte huntabyte mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@dummdidumm