Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

document any moab remediation processes that might be re-usable #1396

Closed
jmartin-sul opened this issue Feb 22, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

document any moab remediation processes that might be re-usable #1396

jmartin-sul opened this issue Feb 22, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
moab_remediation online moab that may need remediation (e.g. missing files, extraneous files, corrupted content)

Comments

@jmartin-sul
Copy link
Member

Start a Preservation Catalog wiki page for capturing re-usable moab remediation notes. These should be investigative procedures and remediation procedures that developers and repository admins can use for approaching preservation objects that fail audits in the future.

To prevent clutter, if a procedure will really only be used once, it might be better to keep it in the issue.

But it may also be a good idea to link remediation issues from the wiki, or at least to try and consistently tag them, for easier searching in the future.

I suspect that most remediations will be unique and hard to fully automate, but I also suspect it will be easier to approach any new remediation if there's some documentation about the types of problems we've encountered and solutions we've used.

@jmartin-sul jmartin-sul added the moab_remediation online moab that may need remediation (e.g. missing files, extraneous files, corrupted content) label Feb 22, 2020
@jmartin-sul
Copy link
Member Author

jmartin-sul commented Feb 22, 2020

i'm not sure using the zenhub blocking connection is the right approach here: but starting this should be blocked on at least one of the linked issues.

but this could be started as soon as we've closed any of:

@jmartin-sul
Copy link
Member Author

though it seems likely we'll want to collect documentation from most (maybe all) of the resolutions of those issues.

@jmartin-sul
Copy link
Member Author

probably can't quite complete this, but i think we can get started on it now

@jmartin-sul
Copy link
Member Author

jmartin-sul commented May 1, 2020

removed the blocker about re-archiving, but ultimately that should be part of this documentation too (see #1396)

@andrewjbtw andrewjbtw self-assigned this May 6, 2020
@ndushay
Copy link
Contributor

ndushay commented Nov 14, 2022

@jmartin-sul if there is further work to be done on this ticket, please ticket separately; personally, I would be okay just closing this ticket.

@ndushay ndushay closed this as completed Nov 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
moab_remediation online moab that may need remediation (e.g. missing files, extraneous files, corrupted content)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants