Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Override common dimensions with signalfx_vary_key_by #780

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 15, 2020

Conversation

rma-stripe
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Fixes a bug where signalfx_vary_key_by does not vary key based on common dimensions (tags).

Motivation

Fixes bug introduced in #776

Test plan

Tested in production + wrote automated test

Rollout/monitoring/revert plan

r? @annab-stripe || @aditya-stripe
cc @stripe/observability

@rma-stripe
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @aditya-stripe || @ChimeraCoder

@ChimeraCoder ChimeraCoder changed the title fix bug where "signalfx_vary_key_by" doesn't vary key based on common dimensions Override common dimensions with signalfx_vary_key_by Apr 15, 2020
@stripe-ci
Copy link

👀 Heads Up

@rma-stripe rma-stripe merged commit 532b017 into master Apr 15, 2020
aditya-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2020
aditya-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2020
aditya-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
eriwo-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2021
rma-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2021
rma-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
eriwo-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2021
eriwo-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2021
eriwo-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2021
eriwo-stripe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants