No need for api_mode to be passed around from individual API methods #1383
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
prathmesh-stripe
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2024
prathmesh-stripe
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2024
…ual methods (#1384) * Changed V1File implementation to pass content_type in options (#1382) * No need for api_mode to be passed around from individual API methods (#1383) * Generated code * We have separate tests for preview mode * Remove unused import --------- Co-authored-by: prathmesh-stripe <165320323+prathmesh-stripe@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that we no longer have V1Files as an api_mode (#1382), we don't need to pass around api_mode from the individual API methods