Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Livestreamer fork ideas #289

Closed
bastimeyer opened this issue Aug 10, 2016 · 14 comments
Closed

Livestreamer fork ideas #289

bastimeyer opened this issue Aug 10, 2016 · 14 comments

Comments

@bastimeyer
Copy link
Member

chrippa/livestreamer#1427

Since Livestreamer isn't being actively maintained anymore and it seems that it has been abandoned by the creator, a couple of people are now trying to organize a fork. Forking livestreamer would mean that we can be sure that issues in the future will get fixed in time and other improvements are being made, benefitting the Twitch GUI. There are some issues though. I've mentioned these in the linked thread above (or here: chrippa/livestreamer#1427 (comment)).

Right now, there is a call for additional people with python knowledge who are willing to help with the fork and some additional unresolved issues. Let them know, if you think you can help. Thanks!

Other related issues here:
#250
#256
#283

@InfernoZeus
Copy link
Contributor

@bastimeyer Thanks for flagging this, hadn't realised that Livestreamer is so uncared for. I've got some amount of experience with Python, and I might be able to help them with some of the more practical matters (setting up automated build/testing, website, etc.).

@lawli3t
Copy link

lawli3t commented Sep 15, 2016

I have some knowledge of python, less so of the technologies involved but i might be willing to help fix some bugs here and there. Does the fork already have its own repository?

@bastimeyer
Copy link
Member Author

I'm not sure. There are a couple of people who have already pushed fixes and stuff to their own forks, but AFAIK there is no official one yet. Just click on the linked thread. You should ask them, I'm just helping finding more people here.

@cdrage
Copy link

cdrage commented Sep 16, 2016

@bastimeyer @lawli3t @InfernoZeus i'm interesting in devoting some time to this. i have some knowledge of python, and maintenance, however, I'd only be able to devote a few hours a week to this, just enough to maintain it.

anyone want to come up with a decent name / alternative to "livestreamer"?

@lawli3t
Copy link

lawli3t commented Sep 16, 2016

yes, a central authority would definitely be nice - i dont think
self-organizing with complete strangers is sensible (albeit possible).

off the top of my head i only get some cheesy names

  • pystreamer
  • streamage

On 16 Sep 2016 6:30 pm, "Charlie Drage" notifications@github.com wrote:

@bastimeyer https://github.com/bastimeyer @lawli3t
https://github.com/lawli3t @InfernoZeus https://github.com/InfernoZeus
i'm interesting in devoting some time to this. i have some knowledge of
python, and maintenance, however, I'd only be able to devote a few hours a
week to this, just enough to maintain it.

anyone want to come up with a decent name / alternative to "livestreamer"?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#289 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAsfeERzgZmmp4Kx1wYPd1WrvnEhvfuEks5qqsQtgaJpZM4Jhl2s
.

@cdrage
Copy link

cdrage commented Sep 16, 2016

imo, the project is big enough that we should create an organization repo for it, there's a large need for something like this.

streamage sounds like garbage :(

i like pystreamer, but pystream and pystreamer looks to be already used on pip

streamlink maybe? doesn't seem to be taken either

@cdrage
Copy link

cdrage commented Sep 17, 2016

Hey guys! @InfernoZeus @lawli3t

I've created https://github.com/streamlink/streamlink and I've added a bunch of collaborators.

Feel free to ping me if you'd like to be added to the collaborators list, otherwise, ping anyone from the "members" group as well.

@lawli3t
Copy link

lawli3t commented Sep 17, 2016

sure add me, i might even find some time this week @cdrage

On 17 Sep 2016 5:25 pm, "Charlie Drage" notifications@github.com wrote:

Hey guys! @InfernoZeus https://github.com/InfernoZeus @lawli3t
https://github.com/lawli3t

I've created https://github.com/streamlink/streamlink and I've added a
bunch of collaborators.

Feel free to ping me if you'd like to be added to the collaborators list,
otherwise, ping anyone from the "members" group as well.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#289 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAsfeGkYwPiioZOt0YPDHvqXyQjkhU92ks5qrAZ_gaJpZM4Jhl2s
.

@bastimeyer
Copy link
Member Author

@cdrage @lawli3t

streamlink maybe? doesn't seem to be taken either

I forgot to mention this here and in the other thread yesterday and I regret not doing this immediately, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea keeping that name. There's already a company called StreamLink Software.
I was too lazy checking this name for myself, because the repo was already created when I came back to my computer yesterday and I thought everything was fine. I didn't even see your post here asking for a decent name.
The name itself is ok and fitting, but there could definitely be some (legal) issues with it in the future. Can github orgas be renamed or is this restricted to repos?
Don't ask me to come up with an alternative, I'm the worst person on this planet you could ask for naming stuff, so please don't. 😞

@KaiSforza
Copy link

Why not just wrap it around youtube-dl instead? That seems to be actively developed.

@bastimeyer
Copy link
Member Author

@KaiSforza
yt-dl works a bit differently... See streamlink/streamlink#7 for a discussion about that.

Streamlink seems to be on a good way and will be added here in addition to livestreamer once the remaining issues have been resolved. I will make sure that both livestreamer and streamlink can be used, as long as both keep working (the same way). Once livestreamer breaks, it will be removed.

I'm not sure about a re-brand of the application yet. I guess I will wait a bit first and then see what the best solution will be. Since there are multiple people working on streamlink, the possibility of it becoming another unmaintained software is relatively low. Maybe a transition of this repo here to the streamlink orga could also make sense, but as I've said, I going to wait a bit first before doing such a transition.

@cdrage
Copy link

cdrage commented Sep 25, 2016

@bastimeyer if you want to transition this to the streamlink org i'd be +1 +1 for it.

@TheSneakySniper
Copy link

There shouldn't be any legal problems, because nobody is making any money off of this. http://www.streamlinksoftware.com/
but if you want to be safe, you should probably change the name now, to something along the lines of...
vidalive?
I am horrible with names. sorry.

@bastimeyer
Copy link
Member Author

This can be closed now.
I have opened a new issue for the repo transition: #331

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants