-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat!: using ica controller instead of intertx #1069
Merged
Reecepbcups
merged 7 commits into
strangelove-ventures:main
from
spoo-bar:spoorthi/using-ica-controller-instead-of-intertx
Apr 15, 2024
Merged
feat!: using ica controller instead of intertx #1069
Reecepbcups
merged 7 commits into
strangelove-ventures:main
from
spoo-bar:spoorthi/using-ica-controller-instead-of-intertx
Apr 15, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…controller-instead-of-intertx
This reverts commit 2638272.
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Ignored Deployment
|
Reecepbcups
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! This can be moved in another PR to it's own file once some gRPC queries are added on top. Not a priority just a nice to have.
Thanks for your work!
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
* replacing intertx with interchain account controller * adding generic icatx support * updating SendICABankTransfer to use interchain account controller module * adding chain level wrappers for ica controller * go mod * Revert "go mod" This reverts commit 2638272. (cherry picked from commit 94f966a) # Conflicts: # chain/cosmos/chain_node.go # chain/cosmos/cosmos_chain.go
Reecepbcups
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2024
…1074) * feat!: using ica controller instead of intertx (#1069) * replacing intertx with interchain account controller * adding generic icatx support * updating SendICABankTransfer to use interchain account controller module * adding chain level wrappers for ica controller * go mod * Revert "go mod" This reverts commit 2638272. (cherry picked from commit 94f966a) # Conflicts: # chain/cosmos/chain_node.go # chain/cosmos/cosmos_chain.go * fix changes in v7 from v8 --------- Co-authored-by: Spoorthi <9302666+spoo-bar@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Reece Williams <reecepbcups@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
interchain-accounts controller
instead ofintertx
module as it is deprecated.With the moving of the module features to module_modname.go, open to moving the ica features to
module_ica_controller.go