-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update the names of add_ap opcodes #341
update the names of add_ap opcodes #341
Conversation
let (mut trace, mut lookup_data, mut sub_components_inputs) = unsafe { | ||
( | ||
ComponentTrace::<N_TRACE_COLUMNS>::uninitialized(log_size), | ||
LookupData::uninitialized(log_n_packed_rows), | ||
SubComponentInputs::uninitialized(log_size), | ||
) | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
eedc13c
to
3a4c6c0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 0 of 21 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @semgrep-code-starkware-libs[bot] and @shaharsamocha7)
let (mut trace, mut lookup_data, mut sub_components_inputs) = unsafe { | ||
( | ||
ComponentTrace::<N_TRACE_COLUMNS>::uninitialized(log_size), | ||
LookupData::uninitialized(log_n_packed_rows), | ||
SubComponentInputs::uninitialized(log_size), | ||
) | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 0 of 21 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich, @ohad-nir-starkware, @semgrep-code-starkware-libs[bot], and @shaharsamocha7)
stwo_cairo_prover/crates/prover/src/cairo_air/opcodes_air.rs
line 99 at r2 (raw file):
self.add_ap.iter().map(|c| c.log_sizes()), self.add_ap_op_1_base_fp.iter().map(|c| c.log_sizes()), self.add_ap_imm.iter().map(|c| c.log_sizes()),
sort alphabetically everywhere,
you can do this with ctrl+shift+p+"sort ascending"
Code quote:
self.add_ap_op_1_base_fp.iter().map(|c| c.log_sizes()),
self.add_ap_imm.iter().map(|c| c.log_sizes()),
3a4c6c0
to
294c250
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 0 of 21 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich, @ohad-starkware, @semgrep-code-starkware-libs[bot], and @shaharsamocha7)
stwo_cairo_prover/crates/prover/src/cairo_air/opcodes_air.rs
line 99 at r2 (raw file):
Previously, ohad-starkware (Ohad) wrote…
sort alphabetically everywhere,
you can do this with ctrl+shift+p+"sort ascending"
that is a nontrivial amount of work and I would have to repeat that 7 times.
the order might change as each PR merges, so I rather just do it once on the 7th PR or even make an 8th PR for that.
Previously, ohad-nir-starkware (Ohad Nir) wrote…
alright |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 6 of 21 files at r1, 3 of 5 files at r2, 6 of 8 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 15 of 21 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich, @semgrep-code-starkware-libs[bot], and @shaharsamocha7)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 2 of 21 files at r1, 1 of 5 files at r2, 2 of 8 files at r3.
Reviewable status: 20 of 21 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich, @semgrep-code-starkware-libs[bot], and @shaharsamocha7)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dismissed @semgrep-code-starkware-libs[bot] from a discussion.
Reviewable status: 20 of 21 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich and @shaharsamocha7)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 8 of 21 files at r1, 5 of 5 files at r2, 8 of 8 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich and @shaharsamocha7)
sorry missed that |
This change is