Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update kayobe-automation submodule and workflows #1309

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: stackhpc/2023.1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jackhodgkiss
Copy link
Contributor

Upgrade both the submodule used by kayobe-automation and the workflows collection that can generate GitHub workflows.

Changes include:

  • Run config-diff in parallel
  • Automation detect vaulted files for config-diff
  • Add support for running hooks that use roles
  • Improvements to Tempest including the ability to run only failed tests
  • Use less verbose input descriptions
  • Bump up and pin the version of Actions and containers used by the workflows

@jackhodgkiss jackhodgkiss added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 27, 2024
@jackhodgkiss jackhodgkiss self-assigned this Sep 27, 2024
@jackhodgkiss jackhodgkiss requested a review from a team as a code owner September 27, 2024 15:12
Upgrade both the submodule used by `kayobe-automation` and the workflows
collection that can generate `GitHub` workflows.

Changes include:
  - Run config-diff in parallel
  - Automation detect vaulted files for config-diff
  - Add support for running hooks that use roles
  - Improvements to Tempest including the ability to run only failed
    tests
  - Use less verbose input descriptions
  - Bump up and pin the version of Actions and containers used by the
    workflows
@jackhodgkiss jackhodgkiss changed the base branch from stackhpc/2024.1 to stackhpc/2023.1 September 27, 2024 15:34
@jackhodgkiss jackhodgkiss marked this pull request as draft September 27, 2024 15:35
@jackhodgkiss jackhodgkiss marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2024 15:47
Copy link
Contributor

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but I also think @jovial should review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants