Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix trove classifier for license #578

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2023

Conversation

avalentino
Copy link
Contributor

The trove classifier for license indicates MIT, and it is clearly inconsistent with the license field in pyproject.toml and with the LICENSE file itself.

The proposed patch fixes the inconsistency.

The trove classifier for license indicates MIT, and it is clearly
inconsistent with the `license` field in `pyproject.toml` and with
the `LICENSE` file itself.

The proposed patch fixes the inconsistency.
@gadomski gadomski enabled auto-merge (squash) August 20, 2023 15:16
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (51f6491) 88.68% compared to head (59267ea) 88.68%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #578   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.68%   88.68%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines         990      990           
=======================================
  Hits          878      878           
  Misses        112      112           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gadomski gadomski merged commit 75824c7 into stac-utils:main Aug 20, 2023
@avalentino avalentino deleted the bugfix/license-classifier branch August 20, 2023 15:27
@avalentino
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks Pete.

@gadomski gadomski mentioned this pull request Aug 21, 2023
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants