Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use ClientResponseField instead of ResponseField in documentation samples #573

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Marza
Copy link
Contributor

@Marza Marza commented Dec 9, 2022

ResponseField does not contain toEntity but ClientResponseField does and is returned by response.field(String)

ResponseField does not contain toEntity but ClientResponseField does and is returned by response.field(String)
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Dec 9, 2022
@pivotal-cla
Copy link

@Marza Please sign the Contributor License Agreement!

Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request.

See the FAQ for frequently asked questions.

@pivotal-cla
Copy link

@Marza Thank you for signing the Contributor License Agreement!

@rstoyanchev rstoyanchev self-assigned this Dec 9, 2022
@rstoyanchev rstoyanchev added this to the 1.1.1 milestone Dec 9, 2022
@rstoyanchev rstoyanchev added type: documentation A documentation task and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Dec 9, 2022
@rstoyanchev rstoyanchev changed the title Fixed client example with toEntity on field Use ClientResponseField instead of ResponseField in documentation samples Dec 9, 2022
rstoyanchev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
ResponseField does not contain toEntity but ClientResponseField does
and is returned by response#field.

See gh-573
@Marza Marza deleted the patch-1 branch December 20, 2022 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: documentation A documentation task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants