Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix JUnit javadoc links #43383

Conversation

ngocnhan-tran1996
Copy link
Contributor

JUnit javadoc links go to page 404


The native image also includes the JUnit TestEngine configured with a list of the discovered tests.

Reference
https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/3.4-SNAPSHOT/how-to/native-image/testing-native-applications.html


...is a JUnit Extension that you can use to capture...

Reference
https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/3.4-SNAPSHOT/reference/testing/test-utilities.html


...method of the helper in your @BeforeEach method if you do not use...

Reference
https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/3.4-SNAPSHOT/reference/testing/spring-boot-applications.html

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Dec 4, 2024
@philwebb philwebb added type: task A general task and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Dec 4, 2024
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 3.3.x milestone Dec 4, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter self-assigned this Dec 5, 2024
mhalbritter pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
@mhalbritter
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @ngocnhan-tran1996 !

@mhalbritter mhalbritter modified the milestones: 3.3.x, 3.3.7 Dec 5, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added type: documentation A documentation update and removed type: task A general task labels Dec 5, 2024
@ngocnhan-tran1996 ngocnhan-tran1996 deleted the fix-junit-javadoc-links branch December 6, 2024 11:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants