Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce @BatchTransactionManager to make it easier to configure Spring Batch to use a custom transaction manager #39473

Conversation

BenchmarkingBuffalo
Copy link
Contributor

Add a new annotation for marking a second PlatformTransactionManager to be used in batch processing.

See gh-37650

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Feb 9, 2024
Add a new annotation for marking a second PlatformTransactionManager to be used in batch processing.

See spring-projectsgh-37650
@BenchmarkingBuffalo BenchmarkingBuffalo force-pushed the 37650-batch-transaction-manager branch from 9e391e4 to 53ab164 Compare February 9, 2024 12:19
@scottfrederick scottfrederick added type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Feb 13, 2024
@scottfrederick scottfrederick added this to the 3.x milestone Feb 13, 2024
@scottfrederick scottfrederick changed the title Add BatchTransactionManager Introduce @BatchTransactionManager to make it easier to configure Spring Batch to use a custom transaction manager Feb 13, 2024
scottfrederick pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
Add a new @BatchTransactionManager annotation for marking a
PlatformTransactionManager that should be used in batch processing.

See gh-39473
@scottfrederick scottfrederick modified the milestones: 3.x, 3.3.0-M2 Feb 13, 2024
@scottfrederick
Copy link
Contributor

Closed via bb87faf.

Thanks again @BenchmarkingBuffalo!

@BenchmarkingBuffalo BenchmarkingBuffalo deleted the 37650-batch-transaction-manager branch February 14, 2024 06:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants