Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RCAL-362 Fix Tvac Filename Node Type #368

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

PaulHuwe
Copy link
Collaborator

@PaulHuwe PaulHuwe commented Aug 1, 2024

Resolves RCAL-362

Closes #362

This PR preserves Tvac & FPS tagged scalar node types.

Checklist

@PaulHuwe PaulHuwe requested a review from braingram August 1, 2024 01:05
@PaulHuwe PaulHuwe self-assigned this Aug 1, 2024
@PaulHuwe PaulHuwe marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2024 01:05
@PaulHuwe PaulHuwe requested a review from a team as a code owner August 1, 2024 01:05
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.69%. Comparing base (087a60d) to head (223b026).
Report is 61 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #368      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.56%   97.69%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          30       37       +7     
  Lines        2788     3379     +591     
==========================================
+ Hits         2720     3301     +581     
- Misses         68       78      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@braingram
Copy link
Collaborator

Is there any documentation on these TVAC and FPS models/nodes and their relationship to the typical models and nodes used by romancal? Specifically, is it expected that running some (or all) romancal steps should be possible with these models? Is the expected output for a step run with TVAC data (for example) another TVAC model or a standard model (perhaps with some extra TVAC metadata)?

@@ -206,8 +227,19 @@ def __getattr__(self, key):

# If the key is in the schema, then we can return the value
if key in self._data:
if (".Tvac" in str(type(self._parent))) or (
str(type(self._data[key])).split(".")[-1].split("'")[0] in TVAC_SCALAR_NODES
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like there is a lot going on in these lines of code. What's the goal?

@PaulHuwe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

PaulHuwe commented Aug 2, 2024

Superseded by work in #369

@PaulHuwe PaulHuwe closed this Aug 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unable to save TvacModel
2 participants