You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we now have a lot of good evidence that f_match correlates with the fraction of genome that will be covered by mapped reads, per the sourmash gather/minimum metagenome covers preprint. It's a little harder to talk about what that means on the metagenome side tho.
and, per #1833, we should mention that the sourmash gather abundances (median_abund, average_abund) are correlated with the fraction of reads that will map to that genome; and that sourmash gather summary information for weighted fraction correlations with % of total reads that will map (see #1818).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
documentation updates needed:
we now have a lot of good evidence that f_match correlates with the fraction of genome that will be covered by mapped reads, per the sourmash gather/minimum metagenome covers preprint. It's a little harder to talk about what that means on the metagenome side tho.
and, per #1833, we should mention that the
sourmash gather
abundances (median_abund
,average_abund
) are correlated with the fraction of reads that will map to that genome; and thatsourmash gather
summary information for weighted fraction correlations with % of total reads that will map (see #1818).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: