Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move dark attribute from MetaAttribute to property #280

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 19, 2019

Conversation

taldcroft
Copy link
Member

@taldcroft taldcroft commented Feb 19, 2019

This simplifies code, and makes the "dark" attribute a reliably-available property.

It also results in the AcqTable object using the "correct" dark current map based on t_ccd_acq.

@taldcroft taldcroft added this to the 4.4 milestone Feb 19, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@jeanconn jeanconn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great.

@taldcroft taldcroft merged commit 632599a into master Feb 19, 2019
@taldcroft taldcroft deleted the dark-property-rebase branch February 19, 2019 22:29
@jeanconn
Copy link
Contributor

At this point, are we provisionally done with proseco 4.4?

@taldcroft
Copy link
Member Author

Has #259 been addressed? In either case I'm fine with cutting 4.4 now. The only question is about remaining issues in sparkles that might need an upstream proseco fix.

@jeanconn
Copy link
Contributor

Right, I wasn't sure if we'd want to recut at 4.4 for anything else with a fix or just call them patches.

Regarding #259, I'd say it has not really been addressed but that the changes we have merged seem reasonable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants