Refresh regression testing and fix ruff / improve variable naming #265
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This refreshes the basic regression testing of
cheta/update_archive.py
which is run on HEAD. The existing scripts and documentation were out of date, including several that only existed as legacy Python 2 scripts. The initial driver was to test ruff updates to that module, but having functional regression testing is independently important.This also fixes a few ruff warnings. While in the code, I took the opportunity to document a couple of key functions and use modern standards for naming variables. The renaming was done using VS code so there is high confidence in correctness. Nevertheless there is no coverage of these changes in unit tests so I will run the manual regression testing procedure.
This should have been two PR's but that isn't the way things happened...
Interface impacts
None
Testing
Unit tests
Independent check of unit tests by Jean
Functional tests
Regression testing on HEAD by using the script
regression_test_eng_archive.sh
:test/compare_regr_vals.py
) all OK.