Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build, meta: drop Python 3.7 support, checks, and CI job #2500

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Aug 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

dgw
Copy link
Member

@dgw dgw commented Aug 2, 2023

Description

This fulfills the last "Finally letting the dead snakes lie." part of the 8.0.0 milestone's description. Python 3.7 was officially EOL'd as of a month ago, on June 27.

Checklist

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md
  • I can and do license this contribution under the EFLv2
  • No issues are reported by make qa (runs make quality and make test)
    • (As of when I prepped the patch.)
  • I have tested the functionality of the things this change touches
    • When I wrote it, I did, with make test etc. (Now it needs a rebase for retesting.)

Conflict notes

@SnoopJ and @Exirel arrived at similar conclusions for dealing with aliases in plugins/rules.py; this has a conflict with 098d8c3, but the approaches are quite similar. That and b0693b7 are both from #2471, which touched a bunch of stuff (so I knew the risk of conflicts with this relatively long-lived housekeeping branch was inevitable).

The only other little conflict is more directly my fault. While I set @SnoopJ loose on my todo list for #2471 to get it done faster, #2480—specifically, 85f8b82—is all me. 🙈

Guess I have to rebase this one, huh? Damn, I love merging branches that diverged long before master because the history graph looks cool, but sometimes it's just not meant to be. 😅

Special thanks

…to the other maintainers for humoring me when I said I wanted to reach #2500 and make this PR a numerical milestone as well as a development one. You're all awesome for tossing in extra issues & PRs to get us here! ❤️

@dgw dgw added the Housekeeping Code cleanup, removal of deprecated stuff, etc. label Aug 2, 2023
@dgw dgw added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 2, 2023
dgw added 6 commits August 2, 2023 00:26
Linking to just `/3/` is admittedly risky, because item/anchor locations
can change across Python versions. Bumping the links from 3.7 to 3.11
gives us a few more years of not needing to touch them.
Can't drop the `importlib_metadata` requirement yet, though. We use some
stuff elsewhere that isn't stable in stdlib until py3.10.
Played with using intentionally wrong types in the definition of a
`PluginMetaDescription` and running `mypy` against it, but didn't see
any (new) errors flagged over that. Maybe I did it wrong, but it took
enough work shuffling docstrings around that I'm committing this anyway.
The test covering `_chunks()` still passes, so hooray!
Regular `dict` is promised to maintain insertion order as of Python 3.7
(which means this could have been done sooner, but it got forgotten, so
we're doing it at the point of dropping Python <3.8 instead).
@dgw
Copy link
Member Author

dgw commented Aug 2, 2023

  • No issues are reported by make qa (runs make quality and make test)
    • (As of when I prepped the patch.)

Well, now the latest version of pyflakes (updated from 3.0.1 to 3.1.0) raises "F811 Redefinition of unused name" for:

def execute_handler(bot, trigger):

The name execute_handler is defined earlier, but never used:

execute_handler = handler

Upstream seems to consider this as "Working as intended" (PyCQA/pyflakes#780), so I guess we'll have to if: ... else: this one now. 🙁

@dgw dgw force-pushed the rm-py3.7 branch 2 times, most recently from 55fe4a7 to f675d27 Compare August 2, 2023 07:58
Copy link
Contributor

@SnoopJ SnoopJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, most of this is pretty straightforward housekeeping.

sopel/bot.py Show resolved Hide resolved
sopel/plugins/handlers.py Show resolved Hide resolved
sopel/plugins/rules.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sopel/plugins/rules.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sopel/plugins/handlers.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Not doing exactly as the comment says because different Rule subclasses
pass aliases as either tuple or list depending on how whoever wrote the
subclass was feeling that day.

Instead, let's simplify the code to do everything in one step, and
unpack the `aliases` iterable so its type won't even matter.

Co-authored-by: SnoopJ <snoopjedi@gmail.com>
@dgw
Copy link
Member Author

dgw commented Aug 3, 2023

Having whittled down most of the open threads from @SnoopJ and myself, I figured it's worth seeing if Exi has free time later this week(end) to chime in.

dgw added 2 commits August 2, 2023 22:11
`importlib.metadata` officially starts existing in Python 3.8, and we
are removing support for Python 3.7 before Sopel 8's stable release.
That means we can use the stdlib approach here to get the version string
for an entry-point plugin, and drop another `import importlib_metadata`.

I can't wait for Python 3.9's EOL... We can remove `importlib_metadata`
completely then.
Copy link
Member

@half-duplex half-duplex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, a couple other grep results:

  • modules/tld.py has a "py<3.5" comment
  • I think importlib_metadata can be removed from a few more places, unless 3.8 doesn't have importlib.metadata.EntryPoint()

@SnoopJ
Copy link
Contributor

SnoopJ commented Aug 3, 2023

  • I think importlib_metadata can be removed from a few more places, unless 3.8 doesn't have importlib.metadata.EntryPoint()

It does have EntryPoint but I believe the behavior of entry_points() changes subtly between 3.9 and 3.10 which keeps the dependency around? I don't know the details myself, but see this comment

@dgw
Copy link
Member Author

dgw commented Aug 3, 2023

  • modules/tld.py has a "py<3.5" comment

My pattern missed that because of the <, whoops. Thanks.

As of Python 3.5, we can do this. It's overdue.
Copy link
Member

@half-duplex half-duplex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does have EntryPoint but I believe the behavior of entry_points() changes subtly between 3.9 and 3.10 which keeps the dependency around? I don't know the details myself, but see this comment

I read that as being about entry_points(filter=) only, not the EntryPoint class itself, but I don't have py3.8 handy to test with.

Either way, we still need the dependency for now, so eh. 🚀

importlib.metadata.EntryPoint *shouldn't* differ from Python 3.8 onward,
unless there's something missing from the documentation. If this breaks
stuff on older Python releases (I'm on 3.10 locally), we will defer this
change until we drop 3.9 as planned per the code comments.
@dgw
Copy link
Member Author

dgw commented Aug 3, 2023

I decided to throw replacing importlib_metadata usage under test/ at the CI for fun. Nothing broke on 3.8/3.9, so 🚀 I guess.

Copy link
Contributor

@Exirel Exirel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I love importlib.metadata. I love the walrus operator (:=). I love removing Py3.7.

@dgw dgw merged commit d58d6a7 into master Aug 9, 2023
7 checks passed
@dgw dgw deleted the rm-py3.7 branch August 9, 2023 07:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Housekeeping Code cleanup, removal of deprecated stuff, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants