-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix SNMP output having fewer unicast queues than expected #330
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -134,11 +134,20 @@ def update_stats(self): | |
if_queues = self.port_queue_list_map[if_index] | ||
namespace = self.port_index_namespace[if_index] | ||
|
||
# The first half of queue id is for ucast, and second half is for mcast | ||
# Count number of unicast queues | ||
pq_count = 0 | ||
for queue in if_queues: | ||
queue_sai_oid = self.port_queues_map[mibs.queue_key(if_index, queue)] | ||
if self.queue_type_map[namespace].get(queue_sai_oid) == 'SAI_QUEUE_TYPE_UNICAST': | ||
pq_count = pq_count + 1 | ||
|
||
# If there are fewer unicast queues than half of max queues, we use the old assumption of second half mcast | ||
# To simulate vendor OID, we wrap queues by max priority groups | ||
port_max_queues = Namespace.dbs_get_all(self.db_conn, mibs.STATE_DB, | ||
mibs.buffer_max_parm_table(self.oid_name_map[if_index]))['max_queues'] | ||
pq_count = math.ceil(int(port_max_queues) / 2) | ||
max_queues_half = math.ceil(int(port_max_queues) / 2) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can achieve https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-snmpagent/pull/330/files#r1786870229 by not doing this check and keeping |
||
if pq_count < max_queues_half: | ||
pq_count = max_queues_half | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could you add a new testcase which could fail the code before your PR? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Added a new sub-case to an existing test case to check. Note: If we will commit to returning all queues, or only returning unicast queues (no matter the number), then this test case, along with other test cases will need to be updated. |
||
|
||
for queue in if_queues: | ||
# Get queue type and statistics | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is best that we don't do this - instead return only unicast queues at all times.