Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix, 202012] Fix multi-asic flaky lldp not ready issue (#9453) #9479

Merged

Conversation

yejianquan
Copy link
Collaborator

@yejianquan yejianquan commented Aug 16, 2023

cherry-pick #9453
Description of PR

In the recover of sanity check, for config_reload, we simply sleep 120s. In some topology, like multi-asic scenario, it's not enough. lldp services get a big chance that not ready after 120s, then sanity failed.

Use config_reload with safe_reload to better handle this flaky issue.

Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Fix multi-asic lldp flaky issue.

How did you do it?
Use config_reload with safe_reload to better handle this flaky issue.

co-authorized by: jianquanye@microsoft.com

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 201911
  • 202012
  • 202205

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

Description of PR
In the recover of sanity check, for config_reload, we simply sleep 120s.
In some topology, like multi-asic scenario, it's not enough.
lldp services get a big chance that not ready after 120s, then sanity failed.

Use config_reload with safe_reload to better handle this flaky issue.

Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Fix multi-asic lldp flaky issue.

How did you do it?
Use config_reload with safe_reload to better handle this flaky issue.

co-authorized by: jianquanye@microsoft.com
@yejianquan yejianquan merged commit 4934f31 into sonic-net:202012 Aug 16, 2023
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants