[hostcfgd] record feature state in STATE DB #9842
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <stepanb@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <stepanb@nvidia.com>
|
/Azpw.run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
/Azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/Azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
volodymyrsamotiy
added
the
Request for 202111 Branch
|
/azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
@yxieca kindly reminder to review or assign someone. |
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 9842 in repo Azure/sonic-buildimage |
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 9842 in repo Azure/sonic-buildimage |
|
/azpw run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
/AzurePipelines run Azure.sonic-buildimage |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <stepanb@nvidia.com>
|
@yxieca kindly reminder to review or assign someone. this is needed for 202111 and we would like to have it there as soon as possible. |
yxieca
approved these changes
Mar 10, 2022
judyjoseph
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2022
- Why I did it To implement blocking feature state change. - How I did it Record the actual feature state in STATE DB from hostcfg. - How to verify it UT + verification by running on the switch and checking STATE DB. Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak <stepanb@nvidia.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Stepan Blyschak stepanb@nvidia.com
Why I did it
To implement blocking feature state change.
How I did it
Record the actual feature state in STATE DB from hostcfg.
How to verify it
UT + verification by running on the switch and checking STATE DB.
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)
Description for the changelog
A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)