Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[staticroutebfd] change bfd to singlehop #16450

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2023
Merged

[staticroutebfd] change bfd to singlehop #16450

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2023

Conversation

baorliu
Copy link
Contributor

@baorliu baorliu commented Sep 5, 2023

Why I did it

staticroutebfd should use singlehop bfd. Because of a bug (portchannel+singlehop) in the SDK, we were using multi-hop as a temporary workaround. Now the SDK issue is solved, need to switch to singlehop BFD mode.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (25039238):

How I did it

change the multihop variable to "false" in staticroutebfd/vars.py

How to verify it

verified it both in UT and testbed. using show bfd sum to confirm the Multihop field is false.

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@baorliu baorliu marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2023 02:03
@abdosi
Copy link
Contributor

abdosi commented Sep 8, 2023

@prsunny can you help merge this

@kperumalbfn kperumalbfn merged commit 4b0b27d into sonic-net:master Sep 18, 2023
18 checks passed
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

@baorliu PR conflicts with 202305 branch

@StormLiangMS
Copy link
Contributor

@prsunny @abdosi @baorliu cherry pick conflict, pls resubmit separate PR for 202305.

@anamehra
Copy link
Contributor

@baorliu , please resubmit for 202305. Thanks

@abdosi
Copy link
Contributor

abdosi commented Dec 15, 2023

@baorliu please create PR for 202305 directly.

@baorliu
Copy link
Contributor Author

baorliu commented Dec 18, 2023

cherry pick conflict
a separate PR is created for 202305 branch:
#17549

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants