-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 302
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Post big extract query #944
Post big extract query #944
Conversation
- adding PostBigExtractRequest plugin example - adding PostBigExtractRequest plugin documentation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #944 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.66% 92.70% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 336 337 +1
Lines 8267 8309 +42
==========================================
+ Hits 7661 7703 +42
Misses 606 606
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good in general!
The only real issue I have is the charset that should be obtained from the query's input encoding.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks already for the changes!
Can you fill in the missing test coverage? This has a couple of benefits:
- It shows why the different code paths are necessary.
- It shows how the different code paths are reached.
- And of course it protects against breaking something in the future.
- 7.8-plugin-postbigextractrequest.php: deleted copyright comment - PostBigExtractRequestTest.php: lower maximum length and fewer fields
Test the literal expected raw data + full test coverage
@mkalkbrenner I can look into an integration test after this gets merged. Don't have the time right now. |
related to
#794 (comment)