This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 22, 2025. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
serialize incremental_snapshot_hash #26839
serialize incremental_snapshot_hash #26839
Changes from 1 commit
ef251b3
ab4bdb9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if there's a better spot. Maybe adding a new struct for non-Bank and non-AccountsDb snapshot fields?
Would that break anything? Would the two vectors of roots need to move as well for that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That might be a better approach, having a struct for optional EOF fields. We also have to make sure we still keep the dependency when serializing, i.e. if we serialize optional field 4 we must also serialize optional fields 1-3 otherwise we'll have eof deserialization errors like before.
I think anything that is default_on_eof should be moved into there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AshwinSekar will investigate this afterwards.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Created an issue to track #27202