-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated to allow Libs folder, updated docs and ISSUE_TEMPLATES #5
Conversation
Pull Request BodyOverviewThis pull request introduces several significant updates designed to enhance the repository's functionality, maintainability, and streamline the pull request review process using AI services. Here are the key changes in detail: New Feature Request TemplateA new feature request template has been added to the Suggested Improvement:
.gitignore UpdateThe Suggested Improvements:
.node-version AddedThe Suggested Improvements:
CODEOWNERS FileA This file defines the ownership of projects and ensures the appropriate team handles code reviews. Suggested Improvements:
Enhancements to
|
if (!result.changes) { | ||
return []; | ||
} | ||
if (!result.typeChanges) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The check if (!result.typeChanges)
could be combined with the previous condition if (!result.changes)
using ||
to improve readability.
return []; | ||
} | ||
return { | ||
body: result.review, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider renaming body
to commentBody
for clarity.
if (!file.to) { | ||
return []; | ||
} | ||
return { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider renaming changesOverview
to overviewOfChanges
for better readability.
return detailedFeedback; | ||
} | ||
async function main() { | ||
let dif = null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Variable name dif
is not very descriptive; consider renaming it to diffData
or similar.
const OPEN_AI_MODEL = core.getInput("openai_model"); | ||
let openai; | ||
if (OPEN_AI_KEY) { | ||
openai = new AiService.OpenAI({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding some basic error handling if 'AiService.OpenAI' throws an error during instantiation.
.map((c) => `${c.ln ? c.ln : c.ln2} ${c.content}`) | ||
.join("\n")} | ||
`; | ||
const response = await openai.chat.completions.create({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The response object in 'openai.chat.completions.create' might benefit from additional error handling or validation to ensure the structure is correct before attempting to access nested properties.
${chunk.content} | ||
${chunk.changes | ||
// @ts-expect-error - ln and ln2 exists where needed | ||
.map((c) => `${c.ln ? c.ln : c.ln2} ${c.content}`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure that you have robust error handling for JSON parsing issues when dealing with AI responses.
try { | ||
const systemMessage = ` | ||
Your requirement is to merge all the summaries into one summary. | ||
Instructions below: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure the format for all AI-driven responses follows a consistent pattern across functions to avoid discrepancies in output.
return JSON.parse(resss).reviews; | ||
} | ||
catch (error) { | ||
console.log('validateCodeViaAI error', error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider handling or logging more details about the error in 'validateCodeViaAI' to facilitate debugging.
Summary
This pull request introduces several enhancements and new features to improve project management and code review processes. Below is an overview of the changes:
GitHub Issue Template for Feature Requests:
.gitignore Update:
.gitignore
file has been updated to stop ignoring the 'lib' directory, which is now included in version control. Previously, both 'node_modules' and 'lib' were ignored, but now only 'node_modules' remains ignored.Node.js Version Specification:
.node-version
file has been updated to specify Node.js version20.6.0
to ensure consistency across development environments.CODEOWNERS File:
CODEOWNERS
file has been added, assigning ownership of all files to the@softrams/open-source
team. This helps in maintaining clear responsibility and review workflows.Main Function for Handling Pull Request Events:
validatePullRequest
,validateCode
, andvalidateOverallCodeReview
have been implemented to generate summaries and compile necessary comments or feedback.AI-Powered Code Review Enhancements:
Javascript Code Improvements:
lib/lib/ai.js
file to enforce stricter parsing and error handling in the JavaScript code.GitHub Service Integrations:
lib/lib/github.js
and added several new functions inlib/services/github.js
for interacting with GitHub's API using the Octokit library.Overall, this pull request significantly enhances the feature request management, code review process, and interaction with GitHub's API to ensure a more efficient and streamlined workflow.
Checklist
.gitignore
to include 'lib' directory20.6.0
in.node-version
CODEOWNERS
file for @softrams/open-source teamPlease review the changes and provide feedback.