Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated to allow Libs folder, updated docs and ISSUE_TEMPLATES #5

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

DarrellRichards
Copy link
Collaborator

@DarrellRichards DarrellRichards commented Jun 5, 2024

Summary

This pull request introduces several enhancements and new features to improve project management and code review processes. Below is an overview of the changes:

  1. GitHub Issue Template for Feature Requests:

    • A new GitHub issue template has been created to streamline and standardize the process for submitting feature requests.
  2. .gitignore Update:

    • The .gitignore file has been updated to stop ignoring the 'lib' directory, which is now included in version control. Previously, both 'node_modules' and 'lib' were ignored, but now only 'node_modules' remains ignored.
  3. Node.js Version Specification:

    • The .node-version file has been updated to specify Node.js version 20.6.0 to ensure consistency across development environments.
  4. CODEOWNERS File:

    • A CODEOWNERS file has been added, assigning ownership of all files to the @softrams/open-source team. This helps in maintaining clear responsibility and review workflows.
  5. Main Function for Handling Pull Request Events:

    • A new main function has been introduced to handle Pull Request events, including parsing diffs and filtering out excluded files using predefined inputs.
    • This function facilitates the creation of PR summaries, validates code, and manages overall code review with AI-assisted feedback.
    • New functions like validatePullRequest, validateCode, and validateOverallCodeReview have been implemented to generate summaries and compile necessary comments or feedback.
  6. AI-Powered Code Review Enhancements:

    • Implemented new AI review functions to generate messages, summaries, and feedback for pull requests.
    • These functions integrate seamlessly with GitHub services to fetch PR details, comment on PRs, update PR bodies, analyze diffs, and compare commits.
  7. Javascript Code Improvements:

    • Added 'use strict' mode directive at the beginning of the lib/lib/ai.js file to enforce stricter parsing and error handling in the JavaScript code.
  8. GitHub Service Integrations:

    • Created lib/lib/github.js and added several new functions in lib/services/github.js for interacting with GitHub's API using the Octokit library.
    • These new functions handle PR details, including fetching PR data, commenting on PRs, updating PR bodies, analyzing diff changes, and making review comments or comparing commits.

Overall, this pull request significantly enhances the feature request management, code review process, and interaction with GitHub's API to ensure a more efficient and streamlined workflow.

Checklist

  • New issue template for feature requests
  • Updated .gitignore to include 'lib' directory
  • Specified Node.js version 20.6.0 in .node-version
  • Added CODEOWNERS file for @softrams/open-source team
  • Main function and helper functions for handling PR events and AI feedback
  • Applied 'use strict' mode in critical JS files
  • Added functions to handle GitHub API interactions with Octokit

Please review the changes and provide feedback.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2024

Pull Request Body

Overview

This pull request introduces several significant updates designed to enhance the repository's functionality, maintainability, and streamline the pull request review process using AI services. Here are the key changes in detail:

New Feature Request Template

A new feature request template has been added to the .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE directory. This template systematically organizes the information required for proposing new features, ensuring contributors follow a structured format to describe the problem, proposed solution, and any alternatives considered. This addition will help maintain clarity and consistency in feature requests, making it easier for maintainers to understand and evaluate them.

Suggested Improvement:

  • Adding an 'Expected Impact' section to the template would help prioritize requests based on their potential value to the project.

.gitignore Update

The .gitignore file has been updated to allow the 'lib' folder to be included in the repository by removing 'lib' from the list of ignored directories.

Suggested Improvements:

  • Provide a detailed rationale within the PR description explaining why it's necessary to include the 'lib' directory.
  • Ensure there is a newline at the end of the .gitignore file for POSIX compatibility and better Git diffs.

.node-version Added

The .node-version file has been added with the version set to 20.6.0. This change ensures consistency across different development environments, helping avoid issues arising from using different Node.js versions.

Suggested Improvements:

  • Add a newline at the end of the file to adhere to POSIX standards.
  • Include a comment or documentation on why this particular Node.js version was chosen for future reference.

CODEOWNERS File

A CODEOWNERS file was created with the following content:

This file defines the ownership of projects and ensures the appropriate team handles code reviews.

Suggested Improvements:

  • Add a newline at the end of the file.
  • Segment ownership if applicable.
  • Document the CODEOWNERS file's purposes for future contributors.

Enhancements to lib/index.js

The pull request introduces significant changes to the lib/index.js file, allowing the inclusion of the 'Libs' folder, updating documents, and adding issue templates. The changes include several functions to validate pull requests, code, and overall reviews using AI services. It also encompasses logic to read GitHub event data, filter the diffs excluding certain files, and conditionally act based on event type and inputs.

Suggested Improvements:

  • Incorporate granular error handling in sub-functions to assist in prompt debugging.
  • Ensure automated test coverage for new functionalities.
  • Enhance code comments for better readability and maintainability.
  • Support more flexible configurations for filtering excluded files, such as using JSON arrays.

New lib/lib/ai.js File

A new lib/lib/ai.js file has been added with the line "use strict";. This indicates an adherence to stricter parsing and error handling of JavaScript code.

Suggested Improvement:

  • Include the actual AI-related functions or code in this file or provide a comment documenting the intent and future content.

Fetching Pull Request Details and Diffs

New asynchronous functions PRDetails and gitDiff have been added to lib/lib/github.js for fetching pull request details and diff information using the Octokit library.

Suggested Improvements:

  • Add TypeScript types for function parameters and return values for type safety.
  • Include error handling mechanisms to manage possible failures in API calls.
  • Validate inputs to ensure they conform to expected formats.
  • Consider passing GITHUB_TOKEN as a parameter or using a configuration module for better flexibility.

AI-Based Feedback and Summaries

Functions for generating AI-based feedback and summaries for pull requests, utilizing the OpenAI API, have been introduced. This includes methods for fetching PR details, commenting on PRs, updating the PR body, obtaining diffs, creating review comments, comparing commits, and a regex for replacing markdown code blocks.

Suggested Improvements:

  • Enhance error handling mechanisms, such as implementing retry logic for transient errors.
  • Abstract repeated blocks of code into separate utility functions to reduce redundancy.
  • Add TypeScript interfaces and types for better type safety.
  • Validate if the OPEN_AI_KEY environment variable exists early in the code.
  • Add documentation regarding each function’s purpose and expected input/output formats.

General Feedback

Overall, this pull request significantly enhances the repository's capabilities, particularly in automating and improving the pull request review process through the integration of AI-based validations and functionalities. The implementation is robust and introduces valuable new features, but slight improvements in error handling, documentation, and testing could further solidify the integration. Excellent work on enhancing and automating the PR review process!

lib/index.js Show resolved Hide resolved
if (!result.changes) {
return [];
}
if (!result.typeChanges) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The check if (!result.typeChanges) could be combined with the previous condition if (!result.changes) using || to improve readability.

return [];
}
return {
body: result.review,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider renaming body to commentBody for clarity.

if (!file.to) {
return [];
}
return {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider renaming changesOverview to overviewOfChanges for better readability.

return detailedFeedback;
}
async function main() {
let dif = null;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Variable name dif is not very descriptive; consider renaming it to diffData or similar.

const OPEN_AI_MODEL = core.getInput("openai_model");
let openai;
if (OPEN_AI_KEY) {
openai = new AiService.OpenAI({
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding some basic error handling if 'AiService.OpenAI' throws an error during instantiation.

.map((c) => `${c.ln ? c.ln : c.ln2} ${c.content}`)
.join("\n")}
`;
const response = await openai.chat.completions.create({
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The response object in 'openai.chat.completions.create' might benefit from additional error handling or validation to ensure the structure is correct before attempting to access nested properties.

${chunk.content}
${chunk.changes
// @ts-expect-error - ln and ln2 exists where needed
.map((c) => `${c.ln ? c.ln : c.ln2} ${c.content}`)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure that you have robust error handling for JSON parsing issues when dealing with AI responses.

try {
const systemMessage = `
Your requirement is to merge all the summaries into one summary.
Instructions below:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure the format for all AI-driven responses follows a consistent pattern across functions to avoid discrepancies in output.

return JSON.parse(resss).reviews;
}
catch (error) {
console.log('validateCodeViaAI error', error);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider handling or logging more details about the error in 'validateCodeViaAI' to facilitate debugging.

@DarrellRichards DarrellRichards merged commit d30b995 into main Jun 5, 2024
1 check passed
@DarrellRichards DarrellRichards deleted the docs-update branch June 5, 2024 02:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant