Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 13, 2024. It is now read-only.

Add ability to resume a failed job #4

Closed
alexanderdean opened this issue Mar 3, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Add ability to resume a failed job #4

alexanderdean opened this issue Mar 3, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
@ninjabear
Milestone
Version 0.2.0

Comments

@alexanderdean
Copy link
Contributor

alexanderdean commented Mar 3, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Resumption should be stateless - the operator will need to specify which step to resume from.

In the case that a single step is ambiguous, the operator must provide a comma-separated list of steps.

A single step will be ambiguous if that step is on an execution branch which has one or more sibling execution branches. It is ambiguous because Factotum cannot know what progress was made on the sibling branch(es).
@alexanderdean alexanderdean added this to the Version 0.2.0 milestone Mar 3, 2016
@alexanderdean
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bringing forwards...

@alexanderdean alexanderdean changed the title Able to resume a failed job Add to able to resume a failed job Apr 19, 2016
@alexanderdean alexanderdean changed the title Add to able to resume a failed job Add ability to resume a failed job Apr 19, 2016
ninjabear added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 12, 2016
@ninjabear
Add a "start from task" command (#4)
1d6fcda 
WIP wire in starting from arbitrary task

WIP code cleanup, comments & compiler nags
alexanderdean pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2016
@ninjabear @alexanderdean
Add a "start from task" command (#4)
a2b14a0 
WIP wire in starting from arbitrary task

WIP code cleanup, comments & compiler nags
@alexanderdean
Copy link
Contributor Author

Resolved (@ninjabear use (close #foo) to auto-close tickets on merge to master

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@ninjabear ninjabear

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Version 0.2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@alexanderdean @ninjabear