Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zp/change ganache #51

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Zp/change ganache #51

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

zeuslawyer
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Update to handle 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost.

squash
@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate failed

Failed condition 1.0% 1.0% Coverage on New Code (is less than 75%)
Failed condition 79.7% 79.74% Duplicated Lines (%) on New Code (is greater than 3%)
Failed condition 8 New Major Issues (is greater than 5)

See analysis details on SonarQube

Fix issues before they fail your Quality Gate with SonarLint SonarLint in your IDE.

@@ -588,6 +588,8 @@ return Functions.encodeString(escape("$hello*world?"));
**_NOTE:_** The `simulateScript` function is a debugging tool and hence is not a perfect representation of the actual Chainlink oracle execution environment. Therefore, it is important to make a Functions request on a supported testnet blockchain before mainnet usage.

### Local Functions Testnet
> **Note**
> Anvil is required to use `localFunctionsTestnet`. Please refer to the [foundry book](https://book.getfoundry.sh) for Anvil [installation instructions](https://book.getfoundry.sh/getting-started/installation).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zeuslawyer So there is no way to make this work without users installing Anvil manually first? If so, then IMO we should just keep using Ganache until we have a better solution. This is very inconvenient for devs and Ganache still works fine.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

inclined to agree @KuphJr !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants