Skip to content

fix: exponentialBackoffExpireAt should start at 0 #1561

fix: exponentialBackoffExpireAt should start at 0

fix: exponentialBackoffExpireAt should start at 0 #1561

Triggered via pull request December 4, 2023 19:06
Status Success
Total duration 17m 19s
Artifacts
This run and associated checks have been archived and are scheduled for deletion. Learn more about checks retention

build-pull.yml

on: pull_request
Check conventional commits
13s
Check conventional commits
Compatibility Check
1m 31s
Compatibility Check
Matrix: build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

1 error
Build with Java 17
Task java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask@6061dfa5[Not completed, task = java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter@1a2c49a8[Wrapped task = io.smallrye.mutiny.operators.multi.builders.IntervalMulti$IntervalRunnable@3646f079]] rejected from java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@66fbc34b[Terminated, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 770503]